One O'Clock At The Crane
Guest
Yesterday, ASHRIMPER made an observation that he / she would prefer the CoE be scrapped and the extra 50p a ticket increase for this season used to fund player purchases.
Whilst I defended one or two of the players coming through, a very good point was raised. It's a great idea, in principal, to have a local centre and attract the area's more skillful teenagers. In practice, though, is it working? If not is it a worthwile exercise?
It was of particular relevance last night. A lot of our younger players were on show. You can, of course, look at the terrible conditions, the level of opposition, etc, but it was undeniable that even after taking this into account the performance of a fair few was dreadful.
You can, of course, put it down to a one-off and it would be foolish to judge on just one game. If, however, you look at the final table for 2004's Youth Alliance division we are in, we finished second bottom. and are currently 7th out of 9 in 2005's Merit Table 3rd Division, below teams such as Cirencester.
A fair few of those brought through are also given their head in the reserve team. Last season, however, we finished bottom with just a single point - ironically, with 10 men when Tes was sent off. This season only Stevenage are below us and we have just one win all season. As regulars will testify, watching the reserves is a labour of love.
Now, as I understood it, the CoE costs £170,000 to run, of which £138,000 was paid for by Football League grant. This leaves a £32,000 shortfall, for which the club asked fans to fund, hence the £1.50 per ticket price increase rather than £1 and larger than averages hikes in season ticket prices.
As we have paid for almost 20% for the running of this centre, do you think the investment is worthwhile? You could argue that you can't judge a centre on just one season but it appears we've been getting poor results season after season and very few players making the grade.
Would you rather have saved that £32,000 we were asked to stump up and used it instead to help bring in a player than would strengthen our first team squad? With the first team flying but the rest struggling, this matter seems more relevant than it has for a good 10 years or so.
It'd be interesting to see what other people's views are.
Whilst I defended one or two of the players coming through, a very good point was raised. It's a great idea, in principal, to have a local centre and attract the area's more skillful teenagers. In practice, though, is it working? If not is it a worthwile exercise?
It was of particular relevance last night. A lot of our younger players were on show. You can, of course, look at the terrible conditions, the level of opposition, etc, but it was undeniable that even after taking this into account the performance of a fair few was dreadful.
You can, of course, put it down to a one-off and it would be foolish to judge on just one game. If, however, you look at the final table for 2004's Youth Alliance division we are in, we finished second bottom. and are currently 7th out of 9 in 2005's Merit Table 3rd Division, below teams such as Cirencester.
A fair few of those brought through are also given their head in the reserve team. Last season, however, we finished bottom with just a single point - ironically, with 10 men when Tes was sent off. This season only Stevenage are below us and we have just one win all season. As regulars will testify, watching the reserves is a labour of love.
Now, as I understood it, the CoE costs £170,000 to run, of which £138,000 was paid for by Football League grant. This leaves a £32,000 shortfall, for which the club asked fans to fund, hence the £1.50 per ticket price increase rather than £1 and larger than averages hikes in season ticket prices.
As we have paid for almost 20% for the running of this centre, do you think the investment is worthwhile? You could argue that you can't judge a centre on just one season but it appears we've been getting poor results season after season and very few players making the grade.
Would you rather have saved that £32,000 we were asked to stump up and used it instead to help bring in a player than would strengthen our first team squad? With the first team flying but the rest struggling, this matter seems more relevant than it has for a good 10 years or so.
It'd be interesting to see what other people's views are.