• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Shrimpers Trust News Trust Statement 2/04/24

Why does this statement not call for the consent from 'Martin's financial partner' to be given without further delay?
 
Why does this statement not call for the consent from 'Martin's financial partner' to be given without further delay?
I'll speculate that they need the council leasing agreement signed before they can give consent.

Remember last time it was said the leasing agreement unlocked significant financing.
 
I'll speculate that they need the council leasing agreement signed before they can give consent.

Remember last time it was said the leasing agreement unlocked significant financing.
Yes that is true but would have thought some kind of comment on that issue might be appropriate, perhaps along the lines you suggest, just for some clarity on thecmatter
 
Check the penultimate paragraph.
My point was that the statement makes specific comments about due diligence and the winding up order and clarifies them in detail, but only mentions the other matter in passing without asking for any explanation for the delay by 'Martin's financial partner'
 
They did not spend publis moneys appropratle when the wasted counts amounts persuing the sea ways project did they .
 
Back
Top