View Full Version : Worst performance under Tilson!
shrimpboy
24-04-2004, 06:32 PM
Tilson says on the official site that today was the most disappointd he'd felt since he'd taken charge, and I dont blame him as today was probably the worst we've played under him. No effort, you could tell we were safe. Some of the players just couldn't be arsed and their keeper didn't make one save. Yeovil played very well to be fair but we can play a lot better and we definitely missed the creativity of Gower. Nicolau was MOTM for me(why on earth did Maher get it, he was well under par), our only real attacking threat. I think we'll be seeing Clark and Corbett going in the summer, neither really impressed today.
The thousands of screaming kids in the south lower also annoyed me *http://www.shrimperzone.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif None of them actually watch the game and just spend the whole time screaming and getting out of their seat. Wasn't very clever choosing a team with Yeovil colours either http://www.shrimperzone.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif
Bigdel
24-04-2004, 07:00 PM
To be fair shrimpboy,Ithink full credit goes to Yeovil,very well organised in all departments and snuffed out any chance we had.
Cort had to be MOTM stopped 3 certain goals by throwing himself in the way of goal bound shots.
The one thing the game did highlight was the fragile defence when Warren isn't playing.
One sad note was Jupp again arguing with Cort and Lewis,has something gone behind the scences we donot know about.
Oh and Danny Rodriques was star quality for Yeovil,why cann't Clarke play like that he has the ability,lets hope its not going to be wasted in the non leagues
Have to disagree regarding Corbett and Clarke. Theyve both just come back from the sidelines and just need more games.
YEs we did miss Gower and Petiffer , but alas that happens with a side that have had a nice bedding in period with each other and a succesful run of form .
(Mindn you if only Gower had been playing he'd have run rings around that Yovil defence , Torquay for the play offs me think !)
TheLittleGazette
25-04-2004, 12:40 AM
Quote[/b] (Guest @ April 24 2004,20:04)]Have to disagree regarding Corbett and Clarke. Theyve both just come back from the sidelines and just need more games.
YEs we did miss Gower and Petiffer , but alas that happens with a side that have had a nice bedding in period with each other and a succesful run of form .
(Mindn you if only Gower had been playing he'd have run rings around that Yovil defence , Torquay for the play offs me think !)
Corbett has been playing regularly for the reserves for about 3 months
Matt the Shrimp
25-04-2004, 01:49 AM
Pretty astute summary from Shrmpboy...
http://www.shrimperzone.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wow.gif http://www.shrimperzone.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif
Not sure I agree with the Corbett thoughts - for me, he showed enough flashes in the first 30 minutes or so to think that he's got something to offer next year.
But if Clark was drinking in the last chance saloon, he appears to have run out of juice... Pathetic, IMHO... saw him jogging back after losing possession merely minutes after coming on. *Unacceptable.
Thought Flahavan was poor today. *He demonstrated today that we definitely need a new keeper, i'm afraid. *Beaten for height for their first goal - neither claimed the cross, nor did he punch it far enough.
Nicolau a clear MotM for me - the boy has class.
Bramble was also poor. *But no taking anything away from Yeovil - they worked hard and skilfully as a team and fully deserved the win.
Hope we play a LOT better than that against Torquay.
Matt
P.S. What's with all the Lewis Hunt tinkering? I'm not that convinced by him as a midfielder in general; but there's no doubt at all after today that he makes a cack right wing. Can't remember a decent overlapping move he successfully executed with Jupp. Hey ho.
Einstein
25-04-2004, 02:42 AM
Quote[/b] (shrimpboy @ April 24 2004,18:32)]Some of the players just couldn't be arsed and their keeper didn't make one save.
Nicolau was MOTM for me(why on earth did Maher get it, he was well under par), our only real attacking threat.
Their keeper made probably one of the best saves I have seen at the Hall this season. Maher's deflected shot and had the game been 2-2 in the 89th minute everyone would have wanted to shoot their keeper. It was a finger-tip class stop.
And they say football is all about opinions and this one is certainly different.
I saw a different Nicolau to both you and MtS and maybe even the whole ground, who knows. I saw a Nicolau who couldn't cross, I saw woeful crosses, I saw woeful tackles, I saw someone who couldn't hold the line, I saw someone who didn't know when to release the ball, I saw a very poor left back indeed. Maybe a tad harsh, but a new left back is definitely priority next season.
Einstein
Quote[/b] (TheLittleGazette @ April 25 2004,00:40)]
Quote[/b] (Guest @ April 24 2004,20:04)]Have to disagree regarding Corbett and Clarke. Theyve both just come back from the sidelines and just need more games.
YEs we did miss Gower and Petiffer , but alas that happens with a side that have had a nice bedding in period with each other and a succesful run of form .
(Mindn you if only Gower had been playing he'd have run rings around that Yovil defence , Torquay for the play offs me think !)
Corbett has been playing regularly for the reserves for about 3 months
Hence why he needs more first team football !!!
Barmy Army
25-04-2004, 10:18 AM
Quote[/b] (Einstein @ April 25 2004,02:42)][quote=shrimpboy,April 24 2004,18:32]
I saw a different Nicolau to both you and MtS and maybe even the whole ground, who knows. I saw a Nicolau who couldn't cross, I saw woeful crosses, I saw woeful tackles, I saw someone who couldn't hold the line, I saw someone who didn't know when to release the ball, I saw a very poor left back indeed. Maybe a tad harsh, but a new left back is definitely priority next season.
Einstein
I totally agree with you about Nicolau. I agree that he is a vast improvement on Che, but then again what isn't?
I think some people are blinded by the fact that he comes from Arsenal, and that he has good quick feet. However his quick feet and attempts at beating his opponent often leads to us giving away possession and an attack being brought on us. I think he would be a brilliant left-winger as he has pace, and as I've said trickery, but a good left-back I don't think.
Essex Bambi
25-04-2004, 12:26 PM
Quote[/b] (Barmy Army @ April 25 2004,10:18)]
Quote[/b] (Einstein @ April 25 2004,02:42)][quote=shrimpboy,April 24 2004,18:32]
I saw a different Nicolau to both you and MtS and maybe even the whole ground, who knows. I saw a Nicolau who couldn't cross, I saw woeful crosses, I saw woeful tackles, I saw someone who couldn't hold the line, I saw someone who didn't know when to release the ball, I saw a very poor left back indeed. Maybe a tad harsh, but a new left back is definitely priority next season.
Einstein
I totally agree with you about Nicolau. *I agree that he is a vast improvement on Che, but then again what isn't?
I think some people are blinded by the fact that he comes from Arsenal, and that he has good quick feet. *However his quick feet and attempts at beating his opponent often leads to us giving away possession and an attack being brought on us. *I think he would be a brilliant left-winger as he has pace, and as I've said trickery, but a good left-back I don't think.
I will also agree.
I didn't see the game yesterday but when i saw the Blues over Easter I thought that he strikes the ball well and is always keen to get forward but when he loses the ball is continuely out of position which caused at least 3 goals that I saw. When he is where he is meant to be he makes wrong descions by diving in, trying to kick the ball out instead of heading it, or trying to dribble or pass out when it just needs a good hoove.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.