Shrimper4lifeCBS
Centre Half
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2019
- Messages
- 31
Voted yes but if Rons going to change £400 for a season ticket might vote differently!!!
Yep that is the key question for quite a few people. There is one home game less in the NL, so even if prices are reduced remember to take that in account.Voted yes but if Rons going to change £400 for a season ticket might vote differently!!!
Yes of course lol, what else am I going to do at 3 in the afternoon on a Saturday when all my pals are at the hall having a pint & pie and watching the footy, sit in and watch Loose Women?
Nah, get me back in our decaying ground. Can't wait to be back, missing it. Always will be my team
Are their songs as good?Away games ? otherwise if I am going to pay for non league football might as well pay £5 to watch Manor, great entertainment and they play with their hearts and for the shirt not the money. Beats lose women and lining RM's pocket lol.
There are 2 theories on that. 1 like you say is that people can't wait to be back and will come back regardless of what football is on offer. The other is that people will either be cautious about coming back to crowded spaces after so long, or after so long without going to games will have new routines or realise they dont miss it as much as they thought they would.
Are their songs as good?
The team have been overfunded and thats why the debt keeps increasing. Its why bills have not been paid.
In the last season there is another fan myth emerging, that Ron has spent money on his "Stadium pension pot dream."
Paying off 20 plus players and coaching staff, all of whom us fans wanted gone. Plus record injuries meaning extra players were needed......Thats why we couldn't pay the bills and ended up on an embargo........The irony is Ron has acted like the wealthy fool so many fans think is the answer for a dream chairman.
But all us fans wanted improvements......Remember when Luggy's brand of football was to direct and wouldn't get us out of L2......To change that has ended up costing us £5m a season.
Yes of course. That old myth.
Over funded. Who's fault is that for not having a ceo or refusing any additional backing. Poor judgement again by a chairman out of touch out of his depth and out of money.
Of course we are the chelsea of league 1 and 2 and what success we have had.
No other club spends as much as us or has any success etc.
Ron is a terrible chairman. He can't run the club and is financially unfit to run the club. He has dug himself into a financial whole and the club is now suffering.
Whos idea was it to chase larson etc and appoint Sol and his crew for circa 1 million a year?
Who agreed to kightly, ferdinand, Cox and Ridgewells wages, knowing we could not afford it and they were mostly over the hill with no sell on value?
Maybe if we had a ceo better decisions would be made. But yet again we spend money on utter **** and not on things that matter.
Almost every decision Ron makes is **** poor, misguided or risks the clubs status and integrity.
Anyone who defends him is just as bad. We are heading into non league after another managerial fiasco and having been embargoed for a whole year.
Wake up Rigsby.
I wish I could argue but I can't, you are spot on. RM has destroyed our club and I will never forgive him.
So many poor decisions with appalling timing (Johnstones paint final for one), then the list go's on and on.
His pursuit of Fantasy farm strangely coincides with our demise. What the hell good is a 21,000 all seater state of the art stadium for a non league football team ?
Certainly going to contnue for next season. I enjoy the company of the people I sit with as much as anything else. Time for reflection, will be at the end of next season.
I am not expecting us to bounce back at the fiest attempt, but I do want to see progress.
What happens if Ron builds the stadium, say just two sides initially because we are still non-league and/or pressed for time. He then sells the club but not the stadium (land). The new owners want to finish the stadium, but how can they do that if we are renting? Okay, so Ron gives the club permission to build a new stand, but who's going to lend you money to build a stand on land you don't own? Maybe I don't understand this properly but the benefits to the club, apart from not having to play in a decrepit Rots Hall, are not obvious. Off topic, sorry