Tommy2holes
Life President⭐
As good as he is/was, I think he may have burnt some bridgesLopata was in my opinion one of the best centre backs I’ve seen at the club and still so young. Would absolutely love him back
As good as he is/was, I think he may have burnt some bridgesLopata was in my opinion one of the best centre backs I’ve seen at the club and still so young. Would absolutely love him back
That was towards Ron rather than the management and playersAs good as he is/was, I think he may have burnt some bridges
Transfer policy is going to be tricky. Those under threat of moving on; eg GSM, will stay if they see there is ambition for next season. If COSU don't go strong (and buy say Bim) we could be going in reverse. Then the loss of our top players will keep our targets from signing up if we do not show ambition. As said, it's a tricky one.Absolutely support the sustainability approach but agree if there was a realistic chance to secure Bim for150k it has to be worth serious consideration. He certainly ticks the profile and definitely has the potential for a very good return on a future transfer fee, all hypothetical I know in Bim's case but the principle of such a move should not just be dismissed out of hand and I am sure it wouldn't be by COSU they just need to be sure it would be right for the Club in both the short and long term
Fees are normally paid over a period in instalments? So can be managed within the budget. On a permanent his wage expectations may be a stretch. And he may well want to be in EFL. But age and ability means very realistic possibility of sell on value so in the unlikely event he wants to come and the wage is manageable it would be disappointing if we weren’t keen. But I suspect one or more of the above challenges make it unlikely (but not the fee in itself I would hope).Absolutely support the sustainability approach but agree if there was a realistic chance to secure Bim for150k it has to be worth serious consideration. He certainly ticks the profile and definitely has the potential for a very good return on a future transfer fee, all hypothetical I know in Bim's case but the principle of such a move should not just be dismissed out of hand and I am sure it wouldn't be by COSU they just need to be sure it would be right for the Club in both the short and long term
I don’t think that’s so much that pepple left, more that others joined.Not sure of the fascination with re-signing Pepple. Good player but we've been a better team since he left. Focus on finding the next one.
They did. I was told by a reliable source yesterday that they paid a six figure fee and that Linney is on 3k per week.Carlisle have probably paid silly money for Linney who at 28 has very little re-sale value. It’s risky, but could be a good signing if he does the business. FGR threw money around last summer though in the hopes of getting back to the league first time of asking and the gamble didn’t pay off. Don’t mind them at all as a club, but still hope Carlisle get battered everywhere they go next season purely because of Mark Hughes’ arrogance in his cup final comments.
Nothing to do with Bim leaving. What happened is finally KAF started to get games, which meant we became more attacking, and Bonne got up to fitness and we singed Kendall.Not sure of the fascination with re-signing Pepple. Good player but we've been a better team since he left. Focus on finding the next one.
Your defence is terrifiedNothing to do with Bim leaving. What happened is finally KAF started to get games, which meant we became more attacking, and Bonne got up to fitness and we singed Kendall.
Bim is far better player than Hopper.
Not going to happenLopata was in my opinion one of the best centre backs I’ve seen at the club and still so young. Would absolutely love him back