OllieSteph44
Striker
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2020
- Messages
- 1,089
Can't see any quotes from Molesley about this. In fact, his stance and comments have been fairly consistent.
So you are right. It is bull**** and also didn't happen.
So you would rather the club lied to you for weeks on end than told you the truth?
SOUTHEND United boss Mark Molesley felt Charlie Kelman was not fit enough to feature against Exeter City.
The Shrimpers striker has now missed the last three games amid interest from Queens Park Rangers who have had two bids for the 18-year-old rejected.
But Molesley has not had any updates on Kelman's future.
"I haven’t heard anything more and he’s still a Southend player," said the Blues boss.
"He’s not had as much training as the others lately so we thought physically he wasn’t quite right today."
When asked when Kelman had not had as much training, Molesley added: "He missed a couple of days with a bit of a sore knee.
"He’s done a little bit of light work since then but he’s probably not quite fit enough to be in the squad at the moment."
You might want to try keeping up with the news before calling people out for bull****
Cracking deal if so. Any idea where he got that idea from?A QPR pal of mine believes it is a million "plus add-ons".
Cracking deal if so. Any idea where he got that idea from?
I think it will be Clifford, perhaps in a year or so. Mind you I reckon if Acquah scores a few he might attract some interest
I am not sure the club has been telling lies about things, maybe some half truths and swerves to assist either any negotiations or to avoid being quoted as saying something which would "come back and bite".
With all these type things, and any journalistic stuff the way I read them is to consider the question and then the pros and cons of possible answers that have been and might have been offered.
It is because of the "faux outrage" that often managers, clubs will now stick to a "nothing to say" or "no comment".
For me, I prefer an answer and then I will weigh it up.
CK was always going to go once his agent told him he would get 5 times his wage etc.
If a club is involved in these kind of negotiations why would anyone expect the club to give out any details?I am not sure the club has been telling lies about things, maybe some half truths and swerves to assist either any negotiations or to avoid being quoted as saying something which would "come back and bite".
With all these type things, and any journalistic stuff the way I read them is to consider the question and then the pros and cons of possible answers that have been and might have been offered.
It is because of the "faux outrage" that often managers, clubs will now stick to a "nothing to say" or "no comment".
For me, I prefer an answer and then I will weigh it up.
CK was always going to go once his agent told him he would get 5 times his wage etc.
The deal to include him staying here maybe?Interesting to see already they might send him out on loan