wiggy
Darryl's Love Child
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2003
- Messages
- 4,543
....and anyone that would not swap him for Robinson is deluded!No. Looked like a lump. No skill. Remember the Rory Gallagher song?
"Brute force and ignorance".
....and anyone that would not swap him for Robinson is deluded!No. Looked like a lump. No skill. Remember the Rory Gallagher song?
"Brute force and ignorance".
Looked like the kind of bloke you inherit in a Sunday League team and don't know what to do with him so just "stick the big lump up front"!
Maybe it depends where you sit when we have opinions on players. I saw John White and the big lump engaging with each other for the whole 90 and I thought it was honours even at the end. If I had anything to do with the recruitment at the club I wouldn't bother with Palmer and I would also despatch Theo off to elsewhere.Well your best mate Johnny White couldn't handle him whereas i bet he'd have our present no.2 Theo in his pocket!
Well your best mate Johnny White couldn't handle him whereas i bet he'd have our present no.2 Theo in his pocket!
I wouldn't say he couldn't handle him...he's had a lot better forwards in his pocket in many games. Palmer was a oddball though, a big strong lump of a bloke, with a turn of speed no bloke his build had any right to. He was also pretty handy so John had his hands very full.
I did feel that he wasn't given any support in dealing with him by Demetriou or Turner, either of them - particularly Turner - could have done more.
From what i read ,our players dont know how to play the ball on the ground so that wouldnt work to well.Why not play two small guys upfront who are skilful, tricky and link up well and play the ball on the ground
Good call, I was really impressed by him at Gills away this season.We wouldn't get him as he would cost too much, but the one I would like is Tom Eaves. Great target man and scoring for fun. 28 goals in 57 games for Gillingham.
I’d say he’d be a good acquisition, even though we did sing “you’re just a cr@p Andy Carroll!” at him - lol
Spot onStaggered at some of the comments on here calling for us to sign Palmer or a similar 'big number 9.' No doubt some of those same voices were moaning about the 'route 1' style we played under much of the Sturrock reign. I thought he was awful, won a few headers, that's about all and suited Crawley's long ball style which is the same as most poor League 2 outfits. If people had to watch that dross every week they'd soon be calling for a different style of play. We didn't win because too many players didn't put a shift in IMO, not because of their number 9.
I personally thought a big number 9 should have been top of CP's shopping list last summer. With Ranger, Ladapo and MAF gone we were lacking anyone who can win a header up top.
We did try with that lad from Stoke but it didn't happen, as it often doesn't at our level.
Having said that Hopper was emerging as a great signing, definitely better than Ollie Palmer.
So we cant regret not signing a lesser player because the better one got injured.
What could be the best option for us is to look at a loan option Championship or even PL forwards who are out of favour. Now I know many of us have our doubts about developing other peoples players but none of the much mentioned forwards we have fit the target man job description.
It worked well last year with Mantom even though he was injured. He arrived in the summer far more comfortable and confident of his future with us. So lets try the same with a proper number 9 and use the loan system to out favour. Maybe pick up a player we would normally miss out on. because lets be honest we wont have the money to sign any real quality in January anyway.
Why not play two small guys upfront who are skilful, tricky and link up well and play the ball on the ground