Dilemma

[Napster]

First player just popped, bought him a few weeks back as a batting trainee

16.Darrell Chuguel - 17 yo, BT Rating=3,590
RH Batsman, LH Spin Bowler. He is a steady player with worthless leadership skills and worthless experience.
He currently has feeble batting form, proficient bowling form and invigorated fitness.

Stamina: woeful Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: respectable Concentration: mediocre
Bowling: worthless Consistency: woeful
Fielding: worthless

But just pulled the following:

Nigel Peacock - 17 yo, BT Rating=5,437
RH Batsman, RFM Bowler. He is an attacking player with strong leadership skills and abysmal experience.
He currently has respectable batting form, respectable bowling form and fresh fitness.

Stamina: feeble Wicket Keeping: abysmal
Batting: respectable Concentration: mediocre
Bowling: worthless Consistency: competent
Fielding: worthless

What to do? I only want one...

 

[MrB]

What is Peacock's wage? We know Chuguel is very low batting so as long as Peacock earns more than £700pw he's going to be better than him, even with the competent consistency, plus he has a level more stamina.

Sell Chuguel and switch the net to Peacock.

 

[Napster]

What is Peacock's wage? We know Chuguel is very low batting so as long as Peacock earns more than £700pw he's going to be better than him, even with the competent consistency, plus he has a level more stamina.

Sell Chuguel and switch the net to Peacock.

Peacock's wage is 771 p/w, so done as you suggested. In retrospect an easy decision.

 

[* ORM *]

STAMINA !!!!! How many times do you need to be told ? What are you doing buying at woeful ?

 

[Napster]

STAMINA !!!!! How many times do you need to be told ? What are you doing buying at woeful ?

Sorry dad.

 

[MrB]

Yep, 12 weeks of stamina nets just to get from woeful to mediocre, that's a level of primary.