• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

French start fining muslim women for wearing burkinis

If memory serves, Westcliff is, or certainly was, the biggest Jewish community outside of London so exactly why he was concerned about his beard seems strange. Unless, of course, it was a story consisting of complete bollocks.

Yes, that must be it.

And yet I have to go all the way to brick lane for some decent salt beef
 
:facepalm: Known Muslim extemists have been arrested wearing trousers. Are trousers now a security concern?

:hilarious: When you can't argue properly come up with a completely worthless analogy. Nice one :thumbsup:

Let me explain because it quite clearly escapes you. The Burka, and Niqab specifically, conceal a persons identity. It's easy for a known extremist to don said garments and conceal himself from the authorities. Ergo, it's a security risk. There, got that? Not quite the same as a pair of trouser now is it. Well, not unless you're trying to conceal a pair of extremist underpants :smile:
 
Back
Top