mrsblue
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2012
- Messages
- 9,419
Ok, so two is not 'many'. I wonder what detail is hidden in the rest of your post....
Sadly *** you cannot bury the news even though we know you want to.
Ok, so two is not 'many'. I wonder what detail is hidden in the rest of your post....
Seemingly can't bury the news or make it accurate / relevant.Sadly *** you cannot bury the news even though we know you want to.
The German government? What does 'can't account for them' mean? Don't know where they are or don't know where they came from or something else?
The article stated that 600.000 inside Germany are unaccounted for.
Just read that 359 sexual crimes were reported on new years eve in Cologne
Not discrediting, just wanted to know what unaccounted for meant, if that is all that has been stated then I'll just keep wonderingWaits for *** to discredit your information:winking:
http://www.spiegel.de/international...ill-safe-after-cologne-attacks-a-1073165.html
Report concentrating on the failures so far in justice and Police systems.
Astonishing infomation,yes Merkel certainly deserved her "person of the year"!
Read in the paper today,that 300-400 German police ringed a part of Düsseldorf,they were looking for North Africans,especially people from Morocco,Algeria &Tunisia. 300 were detained,but only 40 arrested,the police are now cracking down in Germany.
The Police President(boss) said that people from N.Africa,especially Morocco,Algeria &Tunisia cause more trouble(law breaking),than other migrants.
Made me think.. 1 .what would happen if they done that in the UK,Brixton,etc?
2..what would happen,if say the boss from Scotland yard ,said that about North Africans?
We all know that WW2 heralded the start of total warfare,which meant that civilians became so-called "legitimate" targets.
That still does not excuse the bombing of Dresden,which was most certainly a war crime.
Do you really think that the allied bombs could distinguish between Nazis and munitions workers etc? :nope:
Incorrect. What about the holy wars? think your find not many were spared there. Think this was before WW2 but could have been last Thursday.
Sorry everyone, I know it's back off topic but can't let rubbish go unchallenged.
Not rubbish like this,certainly.:winking:
You clearly have a bit of trouble understanding the concept of "total warfare."
I suggest you look it up.While I grant you the concept does go back to the mid-19th century,it's usuallly associated with 20th Century warfare and certainly doesn't date back to the Holy Wars. :nope:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_war
So you have just posted a wiki link that totally proves my point - cheers.:thumbsup:
So you have just posted a wiki link that totally proves my point - cheers.:thumbsup:
I think you'll find that the crusades were well before the mid-19th Century.:dunce:
As an aggressor nation, the ancient Mongols, no less than the modern Nazis, practiced total war against an enemy by organizing all available resources, including military personnel, noncombatant workers, intelligence, transport, money, and provisions.[10]]
You would do well to read your own links more carefully...
Not rubbish like this,certainly.:winking:
You clearly have a bit of trouble understanding the concept of "total warfare."
I suggest you look it up.While I grant you the concept does go back to the mid-19th century,it's usuallly associated with 20th Century warfare and certainly doesn't date back to the Holy Wars. :nope:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_war
Granted the Holy Wars could be considered an "earlY" form of total war but since the term itself didn't exist until much later.it's a stretch to see the Mongols etc practising total warfare before the concept even existed in its modern form.