• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Humans used for testing

Humans used for testing - Criminals instead of animals

  • YES

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • NO

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • NOT SURE

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

KrustyTheKray

President
Joined
Feb 2, 2004
Messages
3,201
Location
Wickford
Should a certain type of criminal be used instead of animals for testing?

It puzzles me why this doesn't happen.

At the end of the day, what is a mass murderer good for other than live in prison on tax payers money playing their PS2!!
 
To be fair to mass murderers, they do tend to contribute quite a bit to the economy. Leaving aside the fact that they are probably doing more than any other group in society to combat the pension time-bomb, there is a lucrative side-line in film and book rights as any half-compotent serial killer is likely to get at least a dozen books written about them and a docu-drama or two produced. For some such as "Mad" Frankie Fraser there is even the lucrative after dinner speaking circuit.
 
I'm in favour of vivisection, but performing needless experiments on proven criminals is just stupid.

Why wait for them to commit a crime? Let's just round up all the residents of Birmingham and get cracking, eh?

Bagsy first go on the perfume gun!
 
By giving inmates free cigarettes and toiletries the whole prison economy would fall to pieces.
 
But what if Rose West scrubbed up well with a bit of new make-up? It could spawn a whole new fanbase for her, which would be moderately unsettling...

oops.gif
 
But surely if we tested on convicts, the results would be more accurate than on poor animals!

I'm all for it!

they shouldn't commit the crime in the first place!

Kill a person, get done for man-slaughter, get 3 years max, out on 2! Pathetic.

They should be made to suffer in a lab where animals are tested! Let them rot!!!!!
 
Back
Top