Its far more than that. Plenty of us on here have and do manage people. In most cases the people we manage have to behave otherwise they lose their jobs (unless they are a moderator)
In football no matter how much you have let your boss down someone else will employ you. In the days when you fell in love with the game possible 50% of a players wage was made up in appearances and a win bonus. To be dropped might mean several weeks in the reserves and spam for tea.
Todays manager walks a fine line between discipline and losing the far to powerful dressing room. Fans don't help because they now blame everything on a manger and are more than happy to have ridiculously high turnovers in managers. To me that just lets the players of the hook. I loved Humphrys goal v Sunderland but the last thing i was going to do was to go on the pitch and celebrate with some of last seasons players.
Even when we have good reliable staff who don't need to much 'management' and are good value like JW.... Then fans want better.
For you to claim Bond doesn't have the skills to manage a L1 club is nonsense. He has been in the game long enough and at at good levels to have seen it all. Yes he looks more comfortable in a tracksuit then in a TV/radio studio......That's what I like about him.
If you have 2 very decent number 9's unavailable due to long term injuries. Or
If the team miss chances like Shaughnessy at Cov, and Theo last week. Even if the ball bounces of Lennon for an OG......Is that anything to do with tactics or man management?
You're quite right to say that football management is more than just (man)management.It most certainly is.That was a poor example.Yet you yourself said:-"
Football has its own rules, so you cant apply the Peter Principle to football management". While I would agree that football certainly has "its own rules" as a form of management the Peter Principle applies to it ,just as it does to any other form of management.
Back in the day, (in the late 80's/early 90's) I used to use a well-known (at least in the TEFL world
) Business English (BE) coursebook which included an audio by Steve Coppell. (The unit was on motivational techniques,IIRC),Come to think of it, Stevie Coppell himself, might be,for many, an example of the Peter principle in action.Wonderful player that he was,despite winning 2 promotions from the Championship (with Palace and Reading), his management skills fell rather short of unqualified success at the top level where he'd played.Indeed, I see from Wiki that he's now coaching/managing in India ( just like your old mucker Phil Brown).
KB's own management skills are as, I've said, most certainly open to question.He's only previously managed Bournemouth at L1 level.,wher in his first season in 2006 he just kept them afloat.He obviously won't be achieving any Steve Coppell style promotions with SUFC this season.Indeed success for him with us in 2019/20,as an old mate of mine has said ,would be finishing 20th.As you say "
He has been in the game long enough and at at good levels to have seen it all." Mostly as a coach, however, and practically never as a manager.Unless you want to include his experience in Hong Kong, as well? There 's a reason for that I'd imagine.You don't really have to look beyond his post -match conference after last week's Blackpool game to see why.His communication skills are poor.It will be interesting to hear him talk after the game at Lincoln tomorrow.
While I'd agree that injuries are always a factor in football, that didn't keep SCP in his job last season and it won't work for KB this time around,either.
You'll probably remember, I wasn't one of those calling for Phil Brown to quit (or be sacked).Though I found his defensive brand of football difficult to watch (even on iFollow
).Also his constant touting for any job which became available up North was just embarrasing. I was heartbroken when SCP was sacked but with the benefit of hindsight (as useful in football as in life) it was the right decison.