DTS
The Business
I am currently in the dog house with the Mrs. I thought I would gage the readership of the SZ public to see if this is justified or not.
Now Mrs DtS and I own a cottage in a gated development outside Brighton. We love it here altough I think we might sell up soon as we need more space for the family.
Anyway, the main drawback of the development is there is only a number of visitors parking bays. This is not generally a problem in the day as most people are at work but at night it can prove tough. Its not an issue for us as such as we have our own reserved parking bay.
The Mrs has just been over to the supermarket and come back with a load of shopping. So I collect my daughter from the Mrs whilst she brings the shopping in. No problems so far.
As I look out of the kitchen window I notice that the Mrs has parked our jeep in the visitors spot. Now there is no real need to do this as a) Our spot is closer and b) we have allocated parking.
So when she returns back I ask her why she has parked there she replies my Mum is coming over tomorrow and needs the spot. I should also add at this point there were NO cars either side of our spot so its no like its even a tricky park up which it sometimes can be.
Now I think this is unfair as the Mrs Mum wont be over until at least 10am and knowing her more than likely it will be midday. In the mean time we have got a perfectly good parking spot sitting empty whilst stopping another residents visitor from parking.
I made the Mrs move the car as she now has the camel. Mr arguement is that we would be the first to moan if one of our visitors couldnt park as someone else had nicked a spot they dont need for 18 odd hours. I also think its a matter of playing fair and doing the right thing.
My Mrs arguement appears to be its only one night and the people that normally use the visitors spot are not normally vistors anyway there are more than likely twin car cottages etc.
I am convinced I am right but as usual the Mrs cannot see anyones point of view but her own. My sexual right appear to have been put on hold indefinately at this point but I really dont think I should appologies as I think she had no point.
Who is right here?
Now Mrs DtS and I own a cottage in a gated development outside Brighton. We love it here altough I think we might sell up soon as we need more space for the family.
Anyway, the main drawback of the development is there is only a number of visitors parking bays. This is not generally a problem in the day as most people are at work but at night it can prove tough. Its not an issue for us as such as we have our own reserved parking bay.
The Mrs has just been over to the supermarket and come back with a load of shopping. So I collect my daughter from the Mrs whilst she brings the shopping in. No problems so far.
As I look out of the kitchen window I notice that the Mrs has parked our jeep in the visitors spot. Now there is no real need to do this as a) Our spot is closer and b) we have allocated parking.
So when she returns back I ask her why she has parked there she replies my Mum is coming over tomorrow and needs the spot. I should also add at this point there were NO cars either side of our spot so its no like its even a tricky park up which it sometimes can be.
Now I think this is unfair as the Mrs Mum wont be over until at least 10am and knowing her more than likely it will be midday. In the mean time we have got a perfectly good parking spot sitting empty whilst stopping another residents visitor from parking.
I made the Mrs move the car as she now has the camel. Mr arguement is that we would be the first to moan if one of our visitors couldnt park as someone else had nicked a spot they dont need for 18 odd hours. I also think its a matter of playing fair and doing the right thing.
My Mrs arguement appears to be its only one night and the people that normally use the visitors spot are not normally vistors anyway there are more than likely twin car cottages etc.
I am convinced I am right but as usual the Mrs cannot see anyones point of view but her own. My sexual right appear to have been put on hold indefinately at this point but I really dont think I should appologies as I think she had no point.
Who is right here?
Last edited: