dusterman
Nello
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2010
- Messages
- 1,757
Watching Jack Rodwell against Southampton on his debut for Man City got me thinking about how similar Rodwell and Kane seem to be in that they split opinions between the professionals who rate him and the fans who are far more skeptical.
I don't know if i'm the only one, but I really don't rate any performance i've seen from Kane that highly, even when he has scored. Like Rodwell, he scores some goals in and around the box, but what else does he add? They are both neither box to box midfielders, combative, great passers of the ball or ball winners.
In my opinion, I think both boys are obviously talented, but do not stand out in any position and therefore often look out of place and unworthy of great praise or a regular starting place. For me, Kane is ultimately frustrating to watch, but I really want him to succeed and show something more.
What do you guys think?
I don't know if i'm the only one, but I really don't rate any performance i've seen from Kane that highly, even when he has scored. Like Rodwell, he scores some goals in and around the box, but what else does he add? They are both neither box to box midfielders, combative, great passers of the ball or ball winners.
In my opinion, I think both boys are obviously talented, but do not stand out in any position and therefore often look out of place and unworthy of great praise or a regular starting place. For me, Kane is ultimately frustrating to watch, but I really want him to succeed and show something more.
What do you guys think?