I think that's a bit dismissive. A lot of people mistrust Labour intently when it comes to managing the country's finances - simple as that!Yes agreed, no one should vote Tory but a lot of people are set it their ways and a lot of others are scared of the word socialist.
Good night formthe tories.. disaster averted..
labour missing an open goal by going all remainy after the general election and alienating its core support oop north..
Pandering to London labour who would sooner go non vegan than vote Tory
Indeed, yet the Tories have tripled national debt without a worldwide financial crash in the space of 7 years compared to the debt Labour accrued in 13 years with a worldwide financial crash.I think that's a bit dismissive. A lot of people mistrust Labour intently when it comes to managing the country's finances - simple as that!
Disaster averted, but the BBC have just produced a general election projection based on yesterday's vote and they calculate Parliamentary seats would be:Good night formthe tories.. disaster averted..
labour missing an open goal by going all remainy after the general election and alienating its core support oop north..
Pandering to London labour who would sooner go non vegan than vote Tory
Indeed, yet the Tories have tripled national debt without a worldwide financial crash in the space of 7 years compared to the debt Labour accrued in 13 years with a worldwide financial crash.
And yet the great British public STILL don't see JC and his acolytes as a viable alternative to the status quo, at least not at local level. Care to explain that conundrum given your last post.
And......while I'm here. It's remarkable isn't it. The first sign of the Tories cocking something up (and let's face it there's lots to choose from) and Shrimperzones very own one man Spanish Socialist party is all over it like a tramp on chips yet when the local council election results contradict all he's pronounced for days on end you don't here a squeak......Strange that :smile:
Yes cheap shot I know but i couldn't resist it. :whistling:
Public still don't trust Labour on a local level? Yesterday's results you mean? Not sure how you reach that conclusion. With one council yet to declare:And yet the great British public STILL don't see JC and his acolytes as a viable alternative to the status quo, at least not at local level. Care to explain that conundrum given your last post.
And......while I'm here. It's remarkable isn't it. The first sign of the Tories cocking something up (and let's face it there's lots to choose from) and Shrimperzones very own one man Spanish Socialist party is all over it like a tramp on chips yet when the local council election results contradict all he's pronounced for days on end you don't here a squeak......Strange that :smile:
Yes cheap shot I know but i couldn't resist it. :whistling:
Hilary Clinton has principals?Principles don’t equal power.. losers have principles. Ask Hilary Clinton
Labour backtracked on the customs union leaving the left wing ukip voters with nowhere to go other than Tory
I have no idea why corbo.. an massive anti eu man, let this happen. Unless his power base within the party is all remain champagne socialists from London .. whereas his real support, in the swing seats, is in the regions
At this time in power, at local elections, you would normally expect the party in opposition, especially in opposition at the moment, to "win big". They simply haven't. To end up "neck and neck" if translated to a GE outcome, is simply not very good for Labour and shows that there is still clear mistrust.
they are surrounded by yes people? Not in the slightest - Corbyn needed to be elected leader twice remember because he was surrounded by 'no' people. After being elected each time he invited 'no' people into the shadow cabinet.Very simple message isn't it really. Labour can dress it up any way it likes and argue that it is an unfair judgement of Jeremy, Abbott, MacDonald etc AND that it is "just" a Jewish issue to be sorted BUT they would be wrong and doing the core Labour, non metropolitan past and potential voter wrong too. Have they surrounded themselves with just "yes" people (and momentum activists) that they don't have a true idea of average worries and concerns?
BBC extrapolated this week's vote and calculated that if it had been a GE then Labour would be the largest party in Parliament right now.
they are surrounded by yes people? Not in the slightest - Corbyn needed to be elected leader twice remember because he was surrounded by 'no' people. After being elected each time he invited 'no' people into the shadow cabinet.
I'm not a member of Momentum but I have met many who are out canvassing and they are everyone - all walks of life, just people who are re-engaged in politics and Momentum are very well organised so it's easy for people to be involved.
In the local elections before the 2017 GE Labour did very badly but the GE campaign was so good they they built up to 40% of the vote. These locals there was some good and some bad news but Labour won seats from a good start point. Labour are in control of the vast majority of London and their targets were ambitious and would never be on the radar ordinarily, but of those they didn't win Westminster the share of the vote was 42.8% to 41.1% - that is nicely set up for next time.
BBC extrapolated this week's vote and calculated that if it had been a GE then Labour would be the largest party in Parliament right now.