• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Meanwhile, in America...

Shocking, but there's nothing new in the world. The rich always get away (literally) with murder.
 
There has recently been some pieces about gang and gun crime in the USA and the statistics for that are incredible. Apparently it's safer to be a GI in Afghan than a young black male in most major US cities.
 
In Texas you probably can own a gun at 14, marry at 16, but can't buy "liquor" until you are 21!

I suppose in one way that's not as ****ed up as it seems as people probably should be sober when handling firearms or choosing to get married.
 
All boils down to poor parenting though doesn't it, as in many cases? Kid's not been given proper values, whose fault is that?
 
According to that article, the psychologist has said the boy doesn't link poor behaviour with consequences because his parents haven't taught him that that is the case. Apart from the fact that that opinion is just complete rubbish, it also begs two questions:

  • Why has the court now passed a sentence that reinforces that view?
  • If it's the parents' fault then maybe the families that have been affected should sue his parents. The parents can't have it both ways, and maybe that would stop people using this ridiculous defence.
 
Back
Top