• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

No Platform Policy

Joined
Oct 25, 2003
Messages
568
Location
Basildon,
My Uni union is currently debating whether or not to renew its ' No Platform Policy' and just wondered what other people's views were on the topic

A quick wiki search will fill in any gaps for those who haven't heard of it before, but basically it is a piece of legislation that prevents extremist groups (BNP/National Front etc) from being allowed to speak in university unions/debate halls etc.

Now whilst i am a fierce advocate of free speech, i am finding myself swaying towards the side of voting for this new policy, simply due to the fact i feel groups like the BNP keep raising the same monotonous argument, which is defeated time and time again by simple humanity and common sense. Moreover, i feel that by allowing these sorts of groups a mass stage, we are contributing towards legitimising what they stand for (especially when they come to speak in some of the bigger unions in the country).

Whilst detsroying their arguments is always fun, i feel too many (from my experience) use their opportunity to scare-monger and preach race hate (tactics that work much better in The Sun). These sort of incidents in my opinion have no place in university unions, which should be constructed for reasoned and flavoured debate; not a place where extremist groups and come and play themselves like a broken record to an audience who is inteligent enough to dismiss their views time and time again.

The main issue at the moment in opposition to this policy is that some people believe by banning these groups, the uni will be "sweeping under the carpet" the issues that these groups bring forward. Now i would counter this by saying that is in fact untrue, since many unions still continue to have debates on immigration/globalistaion/cultural identity etc, but in an atnosphere that is not charged with racial and radical prejudice.

I just wondered if any other students or others have encountered this type of policy before and if so what they think of it
 
Top