Norwich dont bid for Eastwood

[steveo]

Canaries chase Halford
Norwich boss Nigel Worthington has confirmed his interest in Col******r's Greg Halford.
Skysports

 

[SUFCFARAWAY]

They lose one of their star players - we keep one of ours. Seems smart business all round. snap him up!

 

[SUBBlue]

With that £7m burning a hole in his body warmer he could buy both Halford & Eastwood...

 

[SUFCFARAWAY]

Quote[/b] (SUBBlue @ Jan. 23 2006,13:49)]With that £7m burning a hole in his body warmer he could buy both Halford & Eastwood...

and still have some left over for some of delia's cook books

 

[Interpol Shrimper]

Yeah but they've got to pay Crewe a sell-on fee of six figures

 

[Shrimper2thecore]

Quote[/b] (glasgowsufc @ Jan. 23 2006,13:53)]Yeah but they've got to pay Crewe a sell-on fee of six figures

Could still afford Halford and Eastwood

 

[Norwichsufc]

From the local paper up here

http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content....9%3A287

 

[Guest]

Indeed they could afford both.... but I'll worry if Norwich actually confirm they are interested and not before.

 

[MilkeySUFC]

Quote[/b] (glasgowsufc @ Jan. 23 2006,13:53)]Yeah but they've got to pay Crewe a sell-on fee of six figures

150k according to the BBC, hardly going to make much of a dent in 7 mil, is it?

 

[Hambone]

If they could take Halford and/or Danns, I'd be laughing all the way to the Championship.

 

[Einstein]

Quote[/b] (MilkeySUFC @ Jan. 23 2006,14:54)]

Quote[/b] (glasgowsufc @ Jan. 23 2006,13:53)]Yeah but they've got to pay Crewe a sell-on fee of six figures

150k according to the BBC, hardly going to make much of a dent in 7 mil, is it?

Think you read that wrong!

£1.5million goes to Crewe. Crewe have done extremely well out of that deal collecting £4.5million for an excellent player, but certainly not a top-class forward in my opinion which his value now suggests...

 

[Firestorm]

Quote[/b] (MilkeySUFC @ Jan. 23 2006,14:54)]

Quote[/b] (glasgowsufc @ Jan. 23 2006,13:53)]Yeah but they've got to pay Crewe a sell-on fee of six figures

150k according to the BBC, hardly going to make much of a dent in 7 mil, is it?

But thats only 2% I am sure I read it was 20% or 1.5M

 

[MilkeySUFC]

Quote[/b] (Einstein @ Jan. 23 2006,15:27)]

Quote[/b] (MilkeySUFC @ Jan. 23 2006,14:54)]

Quote[/b] (glasgowsufc @ Jan. 23 2006,13:53)]Yeah but they've got to pay Crewe a sell-on fee of six figures

150k according to the BBC, hardly going to make much of a dent in 7 mil, is it?

Think you read that wrong!

£1.5million goes to Crewe.  Crewe have done extremely well out of that deal collecting £4.5million for an excellent player, but certainly not a top-class forward in my opinion which his value now suggests...

D'oh. How silly do I feel?

 

[MilkeySUFC]

Quote[/b] (Firestorm @ Jan. 23 2006,15:45)]

Quote[/b] (MilkeySUFC @ Jan. 23 2006,14:54)]

Quote[/b] (glasgowsufc @ Jan. 23 2006,13:53)]Yeah but they've got to pay Crewe a sell-on fee of six figures

150k according to the BBC, hardly going to make much of a dent in 7 mil, is it?

But thats only 2% I am sure I read it was 20% or 1.5M

Just to reiterate....

 

[Interpol Shrimper]

Quote[/b] (MilkeySUFC @ Jan. 23 2006,14:54)]

Quote[/b] (glasgowsufc @ Jan. 23 2006,13:53)]Yeah but they've got to pay Crewe a sell-on fee of six figures

150k according to the BBC, hardly going to make much of a dent in 7 mil, is it?

Norwich message board said it was in region of £1m they had to pay Crewe. I'm sure I saw this on SSN too.

 

[Soton Blue]

Any way who cares about the economics - Col U sell best player. Sounds good to me!