penaltys

[smith southend shrimper]

now leon constantine has gone who will take our penaltys. lets hope we dont go through a stage of keep missing penaltys again.

 

[Andy_S]

Corbett.

In all honesty though, if you watch all of the Constantine pens, there were only 1, perhaps 2 decent ones. Penalties are more about luck than anything most of the time, just look at his penalty against Darlington, or the one in the same game for them.

 

[ianbrown]

will not be on the pitch to take them.

 

[Bigdel]

Who voted Drewe !!!!!!!!!!!

 

[fbm]

Corbett has a 100% record... but if McGleish signs he will

 

[Benfleet_Blue]

Anyone know if theres any truth in this McGleish rumour?

 

[palexander]

Yea, its true - there is a rumour...

 

[Durera]

<span style='font-family:comic sans ms'>Wouldn&#39;t put it past Dudders having ago. And I also wouldn&#39;t be too surprised if he&#39;s goals per game were higher than Connie&#39;s (especially if you discount Connie&#39;s cup goals and games).</span>

 

[sufcintheprem]

Quote[/b] (Durera @ May 24 2004,12:03)](especially if you discount Connie&#39;s cup goals and games)

Why would you want to do that?



As for penalties, all you need (All&#33;) is a player with enough confidence to place a penalty in the top corner rather than the bottom corner. For instance, look at the Horse&#39;s pen in the cup final. You could tell the keeper which side it was going and he still wouldn&#39;t have kept it out.

Personally, I&#39;ve never missed a penalty when I&#39;ve shot high.

 

[Durera]

Quote[/b] (sufcintheprem @ May 24 2004,14:09)]

Quote[/b] (Durera @ May 24 2004,12:03)](especially if you discount Connie&#39;s cup goals and games)

Why would you want to do that?

<span style='font-family:comic sans ms'>Strange crop of my post....

All I&#39;m saying is that Dudder&#39;s Goals per games ratio must be near, or above Connie&#39;s. Lest not forget that Connie also scored a few cup goals - Dudder&#39;s wasn&#39;t eligible, and may have also scored a few had he have been.</span>

 

[sufcintheprem]

Quote[/b] (Durera @ May 24 2004,14:49)]

Quote[/b] (sufcintheprem @ May 24 2004,14:09)]

Quote[/b] (Durera @ May 24 2004,12:03)](especially if you discount Connie&#39;s cup goals and games)

Why would you want to do that?

<span style='font-family:comic sans ms'>Strange crop of my post....

All I&#39;m saying is that Dudder&#39;s Goals per games ratio must be near, or above Connie&#39;s. Lest not forget that Connie also scored a few cup goals - Dudder&#39;s wasn&#39;t eligible, and may have also scored a few had he have been.</span>

I thought the whole point of goals per game is that it gives a relative figure rather than an absolute one.

Although Dudfield may have scored in the cup games, he may not and the only indicator you could get would be his league goals per game. In fact, considering that we were playing teams from the division above, it would have probably been harder,

 

[Durera]

<span style='font-family:comic sans ms'>OK, fair enough - all I&#39;m saying is that Dudder&#39;s would have been up in the charts too if he&#39;d been here longer. And he offers more to the team, IMHO.</span>

 

[Wickford blues]

I think Bentley could take the penalties as it is clear he can strike a good free-kick and probably a good penalty as well.

 

[Welsh_Shrimperz]

McGleish, if he sign, he rarely miss a pens, well he did at Plymouth last game of season. If we get about the same number of pens as last season, McGleish is on way to Golden Boot winner.

 

[Guest]

i think bernie friend should take them.

 

[Sandbach Shrimper]

Bentley would give it a good whack into the top corner