• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Pete Townsend in Southend last night....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cracks me up with some of the ***** that is spouted on here , its ok by some on here to look at child porn as long as you do a bit for charity , but **** me eat a sausage roll whilst walking round Tesco's then you should be banged up for life for being a wrong'un .

Brilliant .
 
I dont suppose we could make a tenuous link in this thread to Rog Adultry could we?
 
There are really times when some of you on here are completely moronic. I posted something I thought would be of interest to a lot of you on here with the Who having been such giants in the music world and probably quite significant in many of your lives musically and suddenly it's turned into a tirade on child pornography and generally patronising have a go at me time.

I'd remind those of you bigots out there that Operation Ore was largely discredited, see this link: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/apr/19/hitechcrime.money

As to those having a pop, well, it's the fairly usual culprits in the main, amazing how they all group together at times like this - and I suppose as it's silly season then it's fair enough. You know what to do if you don't like my posts, as I've said before on many occasions, just put me on ignore then you won't have to read them. There are plenty of people who don't have an issue, the fact that I have lots of conversations with lots of people on here is just a feature of my personality and I also join in with stuff like the Battles and Big Brother so my post count continuously rises - I'm not one for making one off profound and thought provoking posts. I'm sorry if you don't like it - I've changed my posting a LOT (even Einstein said so), I'm not changing AGAIN because a minority of you don't like it.
 
Last edited:
Kay i will go out on a limb here and say its not about you but rather the way you are standing up for a man that downloaded child(yes thats kiddie porn)porn pics and paid for them on HIS credit card,not mine but his card.
You would i feel get the same outcome if verne or ricey or stevo or carl or i had posted along the same lines.
 
Kay i will go out on a limb here and say its not about you but rather the way you are standing up for a man that downloaded child(yes thats kiddie porn)porn pics and paid for them on HIS credit card,not mine but his card.
You would i feel get the same outcome if verne or ricey or stevo or carl or i had posted along the same lines.

I suggest you read the link rather than being judge, jury and executioner.
 
Kay i will go out on a limb here and say its not about you but rather the way you are standing up for a man that downloaded child(yes thats kiddie porn)porn pics and paid for them on HIS credit card,not mine but his card.
You would i feel get the same outcome if verne or ricey or stevo or carl or i had posted along the same lines.

Well said that French bloke. Don't take it personally Kay but your defence of Townsend and previously Michael Jackson (on the basis that he didn't bum the kids, he was just alleged in a court of law to have tossed them off a bit so that's ok really) leads me to suspect that you have fallen into the trap of the "celebrity nonce."

Did you also believe Gary Glitter when he claimed he was out in Cambodia "on business"?
 
Last edited:
The Who are musical hero's of mine and always will be. I do though have to seperate the music from the individuals concerned.

At best Townshend was very silly and ill advised, at worst he is a despicable pervert. I don't know which it is or if it's actually somewhere in between the two. Whatever is the answer he did pay his own money to one of these sites and if he's not a paedophile as he claims then he has still contributed financially to the sick abuse of innocent kids.

I won't let that taint my love for their music, however if I was in that hall over the weekend my thrill of seeing one of my musical hero's would be tainted.

I think it's fair that this topic has started a debate about his alleged crimes. I don't think that should reflect badly on you though Kay, you didn't do anything wrong in posting this up and in what you said.
 
I'm quite sure the allegations were quite widely debated on here at the time the incident happened, which was before my time on here so I have no idea who said what or who may have defended him. Where I draw the line is that both he and Jackson have been investigated and effectively proved "innocent" - ok, I know PT admitted looking at the sites, but there was no more than that. GG, on the other hand, is a proven scumbag of the highest order, as found in a court of law and has served time (not nearly enough) for his offences. The cases are completely different.

Whatever people believe about Jackson, he was exonerated. On the scale of misdemeanor here we are at complete opposite ends anyway, and I object completely to PT being tarred so unequivocally with the same uncompromising bald statement that he must be a paedophile and the insinuations that went along with this.
 
I suggest you read the link rather than being judge, jury and executioner.

Alas due to the fact that im a dunce i can niether read or write but i did deal in the facts as in he DID download and pay for stuff that may be ok in your world but its not in mine and never will be.If people didnt pay for it then there would be no market for it,and you or anyone else can not defend the undefendable.
As for being judge jury and th other one,not me i will leave that to those that know everything about everything.
Great pedo debate by the way but alas again im off for a few days now so im out of it.
Justice for all children,oh and for kay as well.
 
Whatever people believe about Jackson, he was exonerated. .

Didnt it cost him a large amount of money for this exoneration though?

OBL you shouldnt take the PT thing seriously. Its a bloke thing - a chance to have a laugh at something a bit near the mark. I dont think anyone was having a go at you personally.
 
Whatever people believe about Jackson, he was exonerated. On the scale of misdemeanor here we are at complete opposite ends anyway, and I object completely to PT being tarred so unequivocally with the same uncompromising bald statement that he must be a paedophile and the insinuations that went along with this.

MJ bought his way out of trouble - any normal bloke on the street would have gone down for it. The first kid knew what Jackson's crown jewels looked like - complete with white blotches etc etc which was unlikely to have been a lucky guess. As for Townsend, you may well be right and he may just have been doing "research" for a "book I'm writing" that nobody knew about and was never written. I bet he doesn't get asked to babysit very often though.
 
Didnt it cost him a large amount of money for this exoneration though?

OBL you shouldnt take the PT thing seriously. Its a bloke thing - a chance to have a laugh at something a bit near the mark. I dont think anyone was having a go at you personally.

Undoubtedly it did cost him a lot, and now apparently, as reported in the weekend papers, he appears to have skin cancer so maybe God is wreaking his revenge where the justices couldn't. Who knows?

I find it very hard to accept that it is the same group of posters on here that repeatedly take issue with things I say/write and then also have a go at me for being neurotic. It may be a bloke thing, I'm afraid, as a woman I don't see the attraction in porn sites of any sort, however, I am aware there are sick people out there with perverted practices (remember the couple in Wakering with the dog reported recently?), I understand people being angry but I'd much rather reserve my anger and derision for people like Ian Brady, Thompson and Venables, Sidney Cooke and co.
 
If I had been cautioned for this type of offence and :

A) I was innocent.
B) I was an extremely wealthy musician.
C) There was the slightest hint that the investigation was flawed.

I would be getting lawyered up and doing something about restoring my good character..
 
Last edited:
Undoubtedly it did cost him a lot, and now apparently, as reported in the weekend papers, he appears to have skin cancer so maybe God is wreaking his revenge where the justices couldn't. Who knows?

I find it very hard to accept that it is the same group of posters on here that repeatedly take issue with things I say/write and then also have a go at me for being neurotic. It may be a bloke thing, I'm afraid, as a woman I don't see the attraction in porn sites of any sort, however, I am aware there are sick people out there with perverted practices (remember the couple in Wakering with the dog reported recently?), I understand people being angry but I'd much rather reserve my anger and derision for people like Ian Brady, Thompson and Venables, Sidney Cooke and co.

Thompson and Venables? Be fair, they were kids.

ps it's Pete Townshend. So much for all the fans on here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top