• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Napster

The Horse with no Name⭐
Joined
Oct 27, 2003
Messages
35,310
Location
The wilds of Kent
This Brown thing is a complete non-story. The Sun is owned by the same person who owns Sky, who employ Phil to do punditry etc.

So, Phil clearly does not have a problem with his employer otherwise he wouldn't be working there last night.

And the story itself is old and hardly news-worthy. Which makes me wonder - what's the point of it all?

Of course, Phil's angling for a new deal - even though there's a year left. And the stadium saga rolls on.

I'm always a believer in the simplest things are normally right - maybe the Sun needed a page to fill and the journo involved had a story which could fill the gap and they were desperate for something. But then, why did Phil still do the gig last night?

I have no issue with Phil doing punditry, it helps with our image. I have no issue with his personal affair(s). It was rumoured before about him and the Hull chairman's daughter - and everyone knows he's a smooth operator.

But, just but. The timing seems weird - he's not big news. Southend isn't big news. Maybe just maybe there's a bit of weird media manipulation going on.

Thoughts?
 
Top