WESTY_SUFC
Guest
Not quite. The difference with us is, we have invested (gambled) highly in the team, in order to be one of the better outfits in this league. The fact we have such a high wage budget proves this. You don’t sign a player like Kightly, on those kind of wages, just to float around mid-table.
Those who eventually get relegated - from any league - rarely start off in the position we did. To support that argument, there are allegedly 19 teams in this league, who have spent considerably less than us. Why? Possibly because they’ve tried to live within their means.
Meaning if they do get relegated, their immediate/mid-term future isn’t on the line.
Don’t you think that, seeing as we’ve already been in that perilous position before, we should know better by now?
10-years-ago, financial mismanagement saw us go from being a play-off team in League 1, to barely surviving League 2.
So again, I must reiterate that those signs are appearing again. The fundamental thing is that one of our gambles HAS to pay off. If it doesn’t, then we could be boned.
The amount we are gambling on wages is pretty insignificant to the new stadium project revenues which is the real gamble.
I'm not defending Ron by any means. I am certainly not a fan of his. I agree with what you are saying in regards to not running the club financially well from a sustainable point of view.