Roots Hall 27th in Best Atmosphere Table.

[Blue Yonder]

Pretty good effort 27th out of the 92....

https://www.the92.net/stats/overall/atmosphere#.WTVrtGjyvcs

 

[MK Shrimper]

Haha, Col Ewe third from bottom in Lg2. :hilarious:

 

[Hampshire Shrimp]

Good to see franchise bottom.

 

[Floval Flyer]

Interesting stats there.

Roots Hall also came 11th in the character stakes out of 92!

and in league 1 we were 2nd and 3rd in the character and atmosphere categories respectively

Good old crusty Roots Hall :smile:

 

[Rob1920]

Not bad for us, although pleasing to see Stadium MK last, where they deserve to be. Also made me laugh to see The Emirates down in 76th, can't shake off the ghost of Highbury the Library!

 

[mattitouk]

Not to mention Wet Spam way down in 84th!... and we have a better atmosphere than Old Trafford.:smile:

 

[johnlattimerssponge]

Beat Man United again as OT down in 34th spot. Forever in our shadow.:smile:

 

[shrimper-james]

Above Old Trafford, Stamford Bridge, Olympic Stadium and the Emirates, and most importantly, Col Ewe.

Not bad.

 

[united we stand]

I am guessing it gets a good mark for atmosphere because of the acoustics for away fans----------- not necessarily a good thing from our perspective

 

[mfurok]

Pretty good effort 27th out of the 92....

https://www.the92.net/stats/overall/atmosphere#.WTVrtGjyvcs

We're one of the fast reducing number of clubs with a proper football ground.

If we ever leave I for one will miss it tremendously.

 

[California Shrimper]

Not bad but:

[video=youtube;vXIk6CGxEh0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXIk6CGxEh0[/video]

 

[Mad Cyril]

Atmosphere and character aren't going win us the EFL trophy.

 

[Eddy Melito]

I am guessing it gets a good mark for atmosphere because of the acoustics for away fans----------- not necessarily a good thing from our perspective

the acoustics in the away end are awful. The shape of the roof makes it sound loud when you are in there, but thats because the roof just diverts the sound back at you. with a more normal shaped roof (ie lower at the back, higher at the front) it projects the noise a lot better out towards the rest of the ground.

 

[AndyT]

We're going to need to up our game on the pie rating!

 

[mfurok]

We're going to need to up our game on the pie rating!

Best onions?

 

[AndyT]

:sad: No onion rating, sadly!

Our pint rating isn't too shabby.

All in all, a fine effort all round.

 

[united we stand]

the acoustics in the away end are awful. The shape of the roof makes it sound loud when you are in there, but thats because the roof just diverts the sound back at you. with a more normal shaped roof (ie lower at the back, higher at the front) it projects the noise a lot better out towards the rest of the ground.

We are all entitled to our views , but I think you might be mistaken . What you have written goes against everything I have ever read about the North Bank . It also goes against what I hear at Roots Hall when a few hundred supporters can muster more noise than what a similar number of us can do singing in V&W generate

 

[Leoblue]

We are all entitled to our views , but I think you might be mistaken . What you have written goes against everything I have ever read about the North Bank . It also goes against what I hear at Roots Hall when a few hundred supporters can muster more noise than what a similar number of us can do singing in V&W generate

Agreed, the noise from the away end is brilliant.

 

[Kevin Hogg]

Yes the design of the North Bank does make the sound reverberate around inside the stand..that may be the beauty of it. Rather than hundreds of voices going out into the open it creates an internal cauldron ..which can be bloody loud and audible around the ground.

 

[ozzie]

Interesting stats there.

Roots Hall also came 11th in the character stakes out of 92!

and in league 1 we were 2nd and 3rd in the character and atmosphere categories respectively

Good old crusty Roots Hall :smile:

Very true F.F

Wonder how high-higher we would have been if that (stat) had been taken in the late 60s-70s??