• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Should this be allowed?

Is this woman a 'celebrity' then? I've not heard of her until today.

Deselect her for abondoning her constituents.
 
It's up to her at the end of the day.

Personally, I think it's poor judgement on her part.
 
Worth remembering the next time an MP defends their fraudulent expense claims by saying they work so hard for so little money...
 
No it shouldn't.

We abolished transportation to the colonies in the late 19th Century for humanitarian reasons, so as ghastly as Dorries undoubtedly is it's wrong to send her to Australia.

Given your stance on McKinnon, I find it a little hypocritical that you aren't up in arms about the mentally unstable Dorries being allowed to stand bush-tucker trial in a foreign country.
 
As long as it comes out of her 82 day annual leave entitlement I can't see what anyone could possibly have to complain about...

Unless it's the 82 days off a year that MPs get of course...
 
Back
Top