Paulie Walnuts
Newbie
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 1,356
Brilliant Stan, thanks so much for all your efforts so far.
I must confess to having been a little sceptical, but having been part of that Zoom, he's convinced me. God he likes to talk though! We all had to dash for the loo before carrying on our normal business after he'd gone!
He's a Blues supporter if I recall correctly.Stan hinted that the CEO he recommended had a background in Law...
www.linkedin.com/in/tom-lawrence-legal
Would be my guess.
Stan hinted that the CEO he recommended had a background in Law...
I thought that one of the reasons that Phil gave when things had started to become difficult in his first tenure was when Steve Kavanaugh left. Both Stan and Phil have been involved in bigger clubs with larger structures where responsibilities are divined by the role they play and decisions made around the table in the boardroom. I would think that would be welcomed by all involved.Very impressive from Stan and gives us some hope if / when Ron delivers what he needs to do.
My only concern is , PB's reaction to Stan's involvement ( should PB be appointed as Manager and should Stan come on board in some capacity ).
I do see some conflict of interests / egos alone the way - "I'm in charge of that aspect of the club" - "no , that's my domain".
Not trying to be pesamistic , just realistic.
A Manager like PB will only take so much involvement.
Matt The Shrimp?
Stan also mentioned guy from Stevenage at the end didnt he or did I (probably did) mis hear him. Was around the 58 minute mark of the video
Funny you should mention him......Paul Fitz had had a message from him - who knows, maybe that is just coincidence!
That could well be and is what I assumed, but it was an interesting thing to say in someways as people from outside who have not read this board could make assumptions and maybe the CEO of Stevenage could then be in an awkward spot.He was using Stevenage as a grab out of the air example. We are not looking at Stevenage's CEO. I said who it was last week, as somebody else had already let the cat out of the bag.
That could well be and is what I assumed, but it was an interesting thing to say in someways as people from outside who have not read this board could make assumptions and maybe the CEO of Stevenage could then be in an awkward spot.
I really dont care who it is as long as the club gets it right and we move forward
I thought that one of the reasons that Phil gave when things had started to become difficult in his first tenure was when Steve Kavanaugh left. Both Stan and Phil have been involved in bigger clubs with larger structures where responsibilities are divined by the role they play and decisions made around the table in the boardroom. I would think that would be welcomed by all involved.
We couldn't afford the butlers.Matt The Shrimp?
Yeah i heard all of that and saw it which is why i made the comment. I was just putting it out there. N one knows who it is and if they do on here please share. Ron said the guy Stan mentioned was not emplyed in the zoom call last week i thought the guy at Gillingham was srtill there.He actually mentioned him as a Director of football, but as an example. When he said...''From you know...Stevenage'' He's putting his arm in the air showing he's plucked Stevenage out of the air, and he could have said any club as an example. For clarity, here's what he said.
If he discharges some of it and I read in the paper in December that he's got a CEO, and he's decided to have a Director of football, and it's this guy (Throws arm in the air indicating that he's just plucked a club out of thin air) that's come from you know.......Stevenage.......fantastic.