Blueronron
Manager
In fairness SAM, when SA were 111-5 in first innings it seemed a good choice to bowl
In fairness SAM, when SA were 111-5 in first innings it seemed a good choice to bowl
I don't think the toss affected the result. Letting SA off the hook at 111-5 and then batting poorly in the first innings did.
England scored more in their second innings than the first.
Our top 5 batted better than their top 5 but with Bairstow at 6 and Butler at 7, we now have the longest tail in test cricket.
Of course it does help if you can bowl at lower order batsmen....On a low scoring pitch best to bowl it in the right areas, set an attacking field, third man and let the pitch do the work.
It's worrying how quickly we've gone from having such a strong lower order to it being a glaring weakness.
It's worrying how quickly we've gone from having such a strong lower order to it being a glaring weakness.
Blow losing Burns to injury but it was the correct decision to play Crawley despite him going cheaply.
Have to give new players a chance rather than going back to players who have failed.
With Archer sidelined I would have thought Wood may have been an option.
Probably curse it now but Denly is beginning to look the part of a top order test batsman.
Dom Bess is a decent pick as well.
Please don't curse it, I have £20 on him reaching 50
Sibley gone, fate well and truly couldn't resist that temptationShush now, don't tempt fate!