canveyshrimper
R.I.P
And the club expects people to pay more to watch this tripe next season??
Indeed, which is the point I was making about the price increases, they don't or won't represent value for money.
And the club expects people to pay more to watch this tripe next season??
You presumably mark the referees on some alternative scale? You rightly identified that he was "pretty ok" and then gave him a lower mark than every single one of our players. Crawford's "ok" for just 40 minutes warranted 6.5 (I thought he was making no impression anyway)!
Sturrock's dismal performance as a substitute worth 6 (Blair, why don't you try leaving the ground when you "jump" for high balls or don't "intelligent" players do that?). The outclassed Woodyard and the tired, hesitant Clohessey both outscored a reasonably competent official. Very perverse.
I shall stop rating the officials because you pick on my comments at every opportunity. Suffice to say that the vast majority of officials we have are pants, in my book that means they start at 0 and go up from there. The one we had yesterday got several things wrong, and the west lino missed some blatant shirt tugging on Kane when he was the last player and going through, plus some wrong decisions on throws. I also have no idea where the 4th official got only 3 minutes from at the end of the first half! Harry was down for about 5!!! I thought my mark was quite reasonable under the circumstances though why I should be justifying it to you I have no idea.You presumably mark the referees on some alternative scale? You rightly identified that he was "pretty ok" and then gave him a lower mark than every single one of our players. Crawford's "ok" for just 40 minutes warranted 6.5 (I thought he was making no impression anyway)!
Sturrock's dismal performance as a substitute worth 6 (Blair, why don't you try leaving the ground when you "jump" for high balls or don't "intelligent" players do that?). The outclassed Woodyard and the tired, hesitant Clohessey both outscored a reasonably competent official. Very perverse.
I shall stop rating the officials because you pick on my comments at every opportunity. Suffice to say that the vast majority of officials we have are pants, in my book that means they start at 0 and go up from there. The one we had yesterday got several things wrong, and the west lino missed some blatant shirt tugging on Kane when he was the last player and going through, plus some wrong decisions on throws. I also have no idea where the 4th official got only 3 minutes from at the end of the first half! Harry was down for about 5!!! I thought my mark was quite reasonable under the circumstances though why I should be justifying it to you I have no idea.
Sturrock on the radio said that the ball was bouncing much higher than normal and that made it very difficult to control,
Guys the second half wasn't that bad was it ?
as an aside, Sturrock on the radio said that the ball was bouncing much higher than normal and that made it very difficult to control, Is it true that their was an annoucement to say that who ever could kick the ball the highest in the air was guaranteed to be paid on time . I can't see any other reason for what we had to watch
I shall stop rating the officials because you pick on my comments at every opportunity. Suffice to say that the vast majority of officials we have are pants, in my book that means they start at 0 and go up from there. The one we had yesterday got several things wrong, and the west lino missed some blatant shirt tugging on Kane when he was the last player and going through, plus some wrong decisions on throws. I also have no idea where the 4th official got only 3 minutes from at the end of the first half! Harry was down for about 5!!! I thought my mark was quite reasonable under the circumstances though why I should be justifying it to you I have no idea.
Hello there Mr Picky
I shall stop rating the officials because you pick on my comments at every opportunity. Suffice to say that the vast majority of officials we have are pants, in my book that means they start at 0 and go up from there. The one we had yesterday got several things wrong, and the west lino missed some blatant shirt tugging on Kane when he was the last player and going through, plus some wrong decisions on throws. I also have no idea where the 4th official got only 3 minutes from at the end of the first half! Harry was down for about 5!!! I thought my mark was quite reasonable under the circumstances though why I should be justifying it to you I have no idea.
Your choice, but if you put things up on a discussion board I assume it's on the basis of people discussing them. Some may agree, some may not. I've haven't picked up on your comments much at all lately, but if you think that every Southend player performed their job better than the referee did yesterday, I've got to take issue with that. (Mind you he didn't have to contend with a bouncing ball!)
Don't take it personally OBL, Mick picks on everything at every available opportunity.
I wasn't at the game yesterday but can someone tell me when the ball started bouncing ???
Was kick-off delayed ??
Did they have to hold it on the centre spot at the start ??
Or was it when it after being launched skywards ??
I noticed at times the grass was leaping up and slowing the ball down.
There was also an army of Ants by the goal mouth in the second half that seemed intent on tripping Sturrock up every time he got within shooting distance.
We was robbed!
Can't believe somebody's starting on poor ol Blair again. The last couple of games he's realized that he's meant to venture into the penalty area every now and again, and your having a go at him. Panic set in I know, but at least he knows where it is now.
Didn't see the ant incident, is he O.K.?