BILLERICAY BLUE
Rose Tinted Brigade Member⭐⭐
ES,[b said:Quote[/b] (Exiled Shrimper @ April 13 2004,12:41)]Well he managed to keep the March Player of the Month away from the action for 95% of the ninety minutes. Drewe went up there and was a bl**dy nuisance to Huddersfield, and that's why their boss Peter Jackson is reputed to have said that we were one of the best teams to have played at the McAlpine this year. It is a team effort.[b said:Quote[/b] (Matt the Shrimp @ April 13 2004,12:24)]I presume you were at Huddersfield on Saturday. If so, pray tell me what "all-round play" Drewe exhibited. He was woeful, frankly - redolent of Graeme Jones in his "pomp"...
Exactly. Bearing in mind that we don't really have a decent crosser from the flanks in the entire squad bar Nicolau, why don't we play to our strengths?[b said:Quote[/b] (Exiled Shrimper @ April 13 2004,12:09)]Dudfield I'm yet to form an opinion on in that respect, but an initial instinct is that he will create bucket loads with his off-the-ball running and by taking defenders away.
We have buckets of pace, movement, and passing ability in the squad - including Connie, who worked tirelessly on Saturday yet who, all too often, found no-one working off him, because Drewe was off grazing elsewhere on the McAlpine turf. Why not create opportunities through movement and pace, rather than trying (and invariably failing) to cross to a large ineffectual lump?
It has to be Dudders and Connie up front for me. I don't know why we pretend that we need a "PBB" up front where all too often he offers nothing but sweat (admirable, but ultimately not match-winning) and which suggests that we should play a style (knocking it long) which in fact is not one that our squad is adept at - being mostly small, fast, and good with the ball at their feet?
Don't get me wrong. I shall be eternally grateful to Drewe for getting us to Cardiff - his goal against the Scum at Roots Hall will be one of the most wonderful sepia-tinted moments of my SUFC supporting career.
But on too many occasions in the League when Drewe has been up front for us, he has not been the sort of player who has used his size and strength to carve open defences and lay opportunities on a plate for a partner in the way that (say) Ian Benjamin did for us. Instead, Drewe has just looked like a large lumbering lump.
However, that's only my view - and I recognise that, having seen only a fraction of the number of games you've seen this season, my view may well be wrong or lop-sided. If so, I look forward to seeing the positive critique of Mr. Broughton, and what he brings to SUFC...
Matt
That said, he didn't get any efforts away on goal. But by the same token Matt, if you are singling out one match, what did Constantine do against the Terriers? He was anonymnous for large chunks of the game and was pittiful out of position on the right (although why he had to go out there and Tes up front I'll never know).
I think we can do well against the lesser teams in Division Three with Connie and Dudders up front - your Bostons, Kidderminsters, Maclesfields. But when there's some effective defending required, you need your Professional Big Bloke there to cause havoc - to take people's attention away from Dudfield or Constantine. And there are very few in Division Three better than Broughton at that.
Would you agree that we change our style of play far too much when Drewe is in the side? If the 1st half proved anything yesterday it was that if we ran at them they couldn't handle it and were resorted to kicking lumps out of us (Tes for example). We created far more in the 2nd half by playing the ball on the deck and running at them, indeed all 3 goals came from runs at thier defence.
I just think that we are a better side when we play the ball on the deck and in that situation Drewe comes a distant 4th behind Connie, dudders and Tes.
PS - FWIW Tes wasn't as bad as everyone made out yesterday, he just got no protection from the ref at all.
PPS (and I expect to get crucified for this). I don't think Conlon dived yesterday, however I also don't think that Conlon thought it was a penalty either. The ref gave it and Conlon wasn't going to disagree with him. Can't see too many of our forwards doing anything different if the roles were reversed