• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Two quotes from Ron?

hindle_666

Manager
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
1,129
20/04/10

“This reduction in ticket prices will not as a consequence reduce the level of planned investment in the squad.”

27/04/10

Martin also confirmed that "the club would cut the wage bill for next season".

So does it or not Ron?
 
Last edited:
The two aren't mutully exclusive. He could / will have been planning to cut the wage bill. And then he could / will have an amount that they are going to invest in the squad.
 
It depends what his planned level of investment is.

If he had planned all along to reduce the wage bill, he's spot on in what he says. If he planned to spend a certain amount, that also happened to be less than the current wage bill, he's spot on.

Did he say on 20/4 that he would be spending big to attract the best names?

The key word here is planned, not investment.

Without wishing to sound off unnecessairly, this is another example to try and twist what Ron has said. Just because an ailing business is cutting it's overall expenditure, it doesn't mean it's not investing still.
 
You can get rid of two £2000 a week players and get 3 league two players for the same amount and satisfy both of those statements....
 
20/04/10

“This reduction in ticket prices will not as a consequence reduce the level of planned investment in the squad.”

27/04/10

Martin also confirmed that "the club would cut the wage bill for next season".

So does it or not Ron?

Why must cutting the wage bill mean less investment in the squad? Where exactly have high wages got us this year? I suppose it depends on whether people just want to jump all over any single word that comes out of Ron's mouth.

While we're on the subject of investment, what our club needs is a combination of experienced pros supported by younger, hungry players coming up from the lower leagues - a core nucleus of talent supported by Dervitte/Stanislas-style loan players that we might otherwise never hope to attract.

As for wages, we need to set these at a competitive level for the division with substantial opportunities for bonus earnings linked to points gained, clean sheets kept and, most crucially, crowd attendance figures. Not only does this collectively and individually reward players for success but it should also go hand in hand with our ability to pay the wages promised.

Massive investment doesn't always bring results. However, correct incentives (wages linked to performance and paid at the right time) will always drive behaviour. Always.
 
I do hope that he means reducing the wage bill from the past season (including 6 months of Freedman, Revell, Barnard, Joyce, plus a million loan players, and any others that I have forgotten)

Rather than reducing it from where is currently is, as that will be impossible as we need to increase numbers by at least 6 even if nobody leaves.
 
Back
Top