• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Liberal Democrats Why not to vote for these fence sitters


Life President
Jan 20, 2007
Here there everywhere
"Liberal Democrats believe everyone deserves help as soon as they lose their job to find another one. We want to completely change the way Jobcentres help people find work; when people go into a Jobcentre they will be able to talk about what help they need to get back into work and Jobcentres can then get them that help."

Hmm its a lovely idea how you paying for it , what changes are to be implemented . Im not disagreeing with the principle but how , its not like you could get in this time and could tell as you want to do it by selling the crown jewels !

Sigh even the Lib Dems have a women category (Vange , OBL how do you feel separated by this ?) though theirs is under sub section on equality .

Now am i being a little unfair in my criticism of them for being with out the how as to some of policy changes they want to bring about , or do parties that have not been in power for 80+ years not get access to the same information as those who have ?

Public finances
"Liberal Democrats are committed to setting out the tough choices we are prepared to take so that we can balance the country’s books. We will identify lower priority spending that we believe can be cut so that we can protect vital front line public services, which so many people rely on. Beyond this though we believe that the money the Government continues to spend must be spent more effectively."

Well yes but what are you actually going to do , its like saying metrological terms to some one who has just got wet in a down pore .
We need details !!!

Eerrr and thast about it , their site is teh easiest to read but most of their polices are statements of what their intent is with some detail (finace areas i expected much better )... however more on facebook and email so maybe its as they go along.

They are sadly showing more of a lacking factual part which is madness even just looking ta Vince Cable and Nick Clegg.

Did miss out the almost cheeky privatisation of the Post office by Share options . Now only 49% would ever be sold and the profit ploughed back in.

Tsk would not have been like this in Winston's day ;)
Last edited: