• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

More details here -- it appears to be the football leagues idea!-- maybe the lesser of two evils (B teams in football league)


http://www.ciderspace.co.uk/asp/news/news.asp?NewsItemId=23239
http://www.ciderspace.co.uk/asp/news/news.asp?NewsItemId=21766

May 2014 article
The Football League are reported to be putting forward their own plans to act as a supposed counteract to the Football Association's 'B Team' proposals. Earlier this month, the FA England Commission report put forward plans for a new Football League division that would allow Premier League Reserve Teams to be merged into the pyramid structure as a fifth tier division, with them able to gain promotion and relegation up as far as the current League One division.

Those proposals have gone down like a lead balloon, with supporters groups outside the Premier League pretty much united in their opposition to the proposals, whilst a number of clubs such as Portsmouth and Peterborough United have put out formal statements declaring their positions. The Football League appeared to take a worryingly moderate stance on the proposals, with Chairman Greg Clarke also sitting on the England Commission committee that produced the controversial report.

The Daily Telegraph indicates that the Football League are putting forward plans for 'B Teams' to be incorporated into a revamped Football League Trophy competition, with plans to invite 16 B Teams from clubs with EPPP Category One academies to join the current 48 League One and League Two clubs in an extended competition format.

The objective would be to form a Group Stage of the competition, currently sponsored as the Johnstone's Paint Trophy. There would be sixteen groups of four clubs, with each group having a B Team included. Teams would play each other once on a pre-drawn home/away basis, with any matches involving the B Team that see them drawn as the 'home' team played at the Premier League club's main stadium. The winners of the group would follow through to the final sixteen of the competition. This would guarantee each team at least three matches in the competition.

Football League Chief Executive Shaun Harvey has confirmed that the general topic of 'B Teams' and the England Commission report will be on the agenda for the Football League AGM, which is due to take place next week:

"At their summer meeting, clubs will discuss the Football League’s contribution to the England team and how we can enhance our already extensive contribution to the development of young players. While the session was planned well before the findings of the FA chairman’s England Commission were made public, it does now give clubs the opportunity to have their say on these matters. It remains our view that while the objectives of the commission are laudable, the burden it places on our clubs should not be disproportionate or unreasonable. With this in mind, clubs will consider the merits or otherwise of inviting a number of B teams to participate in the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy as a means for improving elite player development while also improving the finances of League One and League Two clubs."

The League are proposing a number of caveats to the above plans. They want all gate receipts from matches played on the Premier League grounds put into a central pool for later distribution to the 48 Football League clubs. In addition they would ask the FA to underwrite any shortfall in gate receipts on the Wembley Stadium final, if it is poorly attended due to changes in the competition - this would be measured against the average Wembley attendance over the last ten years.

The current plans are for this to be trialled over a two year period. The obvious questions to answer are how the sixteen 'B Teams' would be allocated to the individual groups - current JPT early round draws are performed on a heavily geographic basis, meaning that a team like Yeovil Town might permanently find themselves paired with Southampton as an annual event. Given the strength of the Saints academy system, that could easily result in teams in that geographical group permanently blocked off from progressing past the group stages. For League One and League Two sides, this represents one of their main chances of reaching Wembley. If the JPT Final becomes Arsenal B vs Chelsea B due to the strength of those academies, then that door becomes closed, and the opportunity of a big Wembley pay day is lost.

2 March
Unconfirmed reports suggest that the Football League may be considering a u-turn on their willingness to allow B Teams to participate in its competitions. The concept of B Teams was part of the FA's England Commission Report that was published last year, and championed by FA Chairman Greg Dyke, and put forward the proposal for club's with EPPP Category 1 academies to be allowed to field formalised reserve team structures within the English football pyramid system.

That proposal was savaged by supporter groups and by much of the national media, and by the time it reached the June 2014 Football League AGM it was booted out, in what appeared to be a fairly emphatic rejection. However, the vote that was tabled only related to changes to the league pyramid system, with the Football League having in parallel introduced their own proposals which involved inviting Premier League sides into their Football League Trophy competition. That proposal was never formally dismissed.

Last month, Football League Chairmen met at the FA's St George's Park venue near Burton, where they rejected plastic pitches and agreed a new central fund package. However, according to the Dons Trust - the fans run group that ultimately owns AFC Wimbledon, they indicate that the subject of B Teams was back on the Football League agenda, with their meeting notes disappointingly stating that their club had been the only League Two side to openly go against the proposals. A report from the Trust states:

"There was discussion about that day’s Football League (FL) meeting which was understood to have authorised the FL executive to finalise proposals to allow Premier League ‘B’ teams to enter the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy, with AFC Wimbledon being the only League Two club to vote against. It was agreed that Kris Stewart would talk with other trusts to help us decide whether this is something for the Dons Trust to follow up."

During last year's proposals, which appeared to be backed by Football League Chairman Greg Clarke and his Chief Executive Shaun Harvey, most of the concern appeared to be whether the FA or the Premier League were willing to underwrite the losses that might be incurred if a Premier League's B Team did not attract a significant attendance, or where the strength of such sides effectively froze out Football League sides from being able to get a lucrative day out at Wembley Stadium, with the inevitable risk of the likes of Arsenal B vs Chelsea B contesting the final. Great for Sky Sports, but pretty lousy if the likes of Bristol City or Walsall - this year's finalists - were denied their chance to take a cash windfall and promote their club at a Wembley final.

As yet, there's not been any word from the Football League on this subject, but with Wimbledon having informed their fans that such proposals are on the cards, the League will need to make their position clear soon. Our understanding is that last month's meeting was not a binding vote, but gave the Executive Committee enough remit to go ahead and produce firmed up proposals.
 
After reading the post by post united we stand, it seems like Wimbledon are the only ones to openly reject the proposal, so could be that others haven't rejected by releasing a statement.
 
It's been on the cards for a while now, remember Greg Dyke wanting B teams to play in the lower divisions. He's not the only one either, Mourinho and the tool Andre Villas-Boas have both stated they think their reserve teams should play in the lower divisions as they do elsewhere in Europe. I suspect there is money in it for the league teams and that is why league chairmen have voted it in.
 
2016 JTP Final at wembley - West Ham United Reserves v Crystal Palace Reserves - yeah that 'll work
 
More details here -- it appears to be the football leagues idea!-- maybe the lesser of two evils (B teams in football league)


http://www.ciderspace.co.uk/asp/news/news.asp?NewsItemId=23239
http://www.ciderspace.co.uk/asp/news/news.asp?NewsItemId=21766

May 2014 article
The Football League are reported to be putting forward their own plans to act as a supposed counteract to the Football Association's 'B Team' proposals. Earlier this month, the FA England Commission report put forward plans for a new Football League division that would allow Premier League Reserve Teams to be merged into the pyramid structure as a fifth tier division, with them able to gain promotion and relegation up as far as the current League One division.

Those proposals have gone down like a lead balloon, with supporters groups outside the Premier League pretty much united in their opposition to the proposals, whilst a number of clubs such as Portsmouth and Peterborough United have put out formal statements declaring their positions. The Football League appeared to take a worryingly moderate stance on the proposals, with Chairman Greg Clarke also sitting on the England Commission committee that produced the controversial report.

The Daily Telegraph indicates that the Football League are putting forward plans for 'B Teams' to be incorporated into a revamped Football League Trophy competition, with plans to invite 16 B Teams from clubs with EPPP Category One academies to join the current 48 League One and League Two clubs in an extended competition format.

The objective would be to form a Group Stage of the competition, currently sponsored as the Johnstone's Paint Trophy. There would be sixteen groups of four clubs, with each group having a B Team included. Teams would play each other once on a pre-drawn home/away basis, with any matches involving the B Team that see them drawn as the 'home' team played at the Premier League club's main stadium. The winners of the group would follow through to the final sixteen of the competition. This would guarantee each team at least three matches in the competition.

Football League Chief Executive Shaun Harvey has confirmed that the general topic of 'B Teams' and the England Commission report will be on the agenda for the Football League AGM, which is due to take place next week:

"At their summer meeting, clubs will discuss the Football League’s contribution to the England team and how we can enhance our already extensive contribution to the development of young players. While the session was planned well before the findings of the FA chairman’s England Commission were made public, it does now give clubs the opportunity to have their say on these matters. It remains our view that while the objectives of the commission are laudable, the burden it places on our clubs should not be disproportionate or unreasonable. With this in mind, clubs will consider the merits or otherwise of inviting a number of B teams to participate in the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy as a means for improving elite player development while also improving the finances of League One and League Two clubs."

The League are proposing a number of caveats to the above plans. They want all gate receipts from matches played on the Premier League grounds put into a central pool for later distribution to the 48 Football League clubs. In addition they would ask the FA to underwrite any shortfall in gate receipts on the Wembley Stadium final, if it is poorly attended due to changes in the competition - this would be measured against the average Wembley attendance over the last ten years.

The current plans are for this to be trialled over a two year period. The obvious questions to answer are how the sixteen 'B Teams' would be allocated to the individual groups - current JPT early round draws are performed on a heavily geographic basis, meaning that a team like Yeovil Town might permanently find themselves paired with Southampton as an annual event. Given the strength of the Saints academy system, that could easily result in teams in that geographical group permanently blocked off from progressing past the group stages. For League One and League Two sides, this represents one of their main chances of reaching Wembley. If the JPT Final becomes Arsenal B vs Chelsea B due to the strength of those academies, then that door becomes closed, and the opportunity of a big Wembley pay day is lost.

2 March
Unconfirmed reports suggest that the Football League may be considering a u-turn on their willingness to allow B Teams to participate in its competitions. The concept of B Teams was part of the FA's England Commission Report that was published last year, and championed by FA Chairman Greg Dyke, and put forward the proposal for club's with EPPP Category 1 academies to be allowed to field formalised reserve team structures within the English football pyramid system.

That proposal was savaged by supporter groups and by much of the national media, and by the time it reached the June 2014 Football League AGM it was booted out, in what appeared to be a fairly emphatic rejection. However, the vote that was tabled only related to changes to the league pyramid system, with the Football League having in parallel introduced their own proposals which involved inviting Premier League sides into their Football League Trophy competition. That proposal was never formally dismissed.

Last month, Football League Chairmen met at the FA's St George's Park venue near Burton, where they rejected plastic pitches and agreed a new central fund package. However, according to the Dons Trust - the fans run group that ultimately owns AFC Wimbledon, they indicate that the subject of B Teams was back on the Football League agenda, with their meeting notes disappointingly stating that their club had been the only League Two side to openly go against the proposals. A report from the Trust states:

"There was discussion about that day’s Football League (FL) meeting which was understood to have authorised the FL executive to finalise proposals to allow Premier League ‘B’ teams to enter the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy, with AFC Wimbledon being the only League Two club to vote against. It was agreed that Kris Stewart would talk with other trusts to help us decide whether this is something for the Dons Trust to follow up."

During last year's proposals, which appeared to be backed by Football League Chairman Greg Clarke and his Chief Executive Shaun Harvey, most of the concern appeared to be whether the FA or the Premier League were willing to underwrite the losses that might be incurred if a Premier League's B Team did not attract a significant attendance, or where the strength of such sides effectively froze out Football League sides from being able to get a lucrative day out at Wembley Stadium, with the inevitable risk of the likes of Arsenal B vs Chelsea B contesting the final. Great for Sky Sports, but pretty lousy if the likes of Bristol City or Walsall - this year's finalists - were denied their chance to take a cash windfall and promote their club at a Wembley final.

As yet, there's not been any word from the Football League on this subject, but with Wimbledon having informed their fans that such proposals are on the cards, the League will need to make their position clear soon. Our understanding is that last month's meeting was not a binding vote, but gave the Executive Committee enough remit to go ahead and produce firmed up proposals.
Why don't they just leave us alone, all this about helping the English team out , premiership B teams , if the player is not in the first team squad, why will a B team player help the senior squad??

I don't like premiership football, that's why I go to Roots Hall, its not great football , but its more than the football for me and the likes of the glory boys will not like coming to us on a cold Tuesday night , spoiling what little I have left

I despair
 
Absolute farce. Just leave it alone.

The JPT is the only realistic opportunity League 1 & 2 clubs have of reaching a Wembley final.

If the foreign imports were actually policed correctly we wouldn't have this issue of the young British talent needing to play in B teams.

It's not even part of the same league! Clue is in the title, FOOTBALL LEAGUE TROPHY

I would consider a play-off final to be "a Wembley final" and so much more important than the JPT.

It wasn't that long ago that the top Conference teams were included.

Having said that I don't agree with the proposal one bit and is very disappointing that the other 47 clubs' chairmen couldn't muster up a bit more overt opposition.
 
I dont agree with this , would the big clubs want the likes of say Rochdale in the in the Champions League .
 
There is one obvious question that I have never seen answered. Apparently this is all about bringing on English talent and giving them a competitive environment/ competition to play in. Why can't they simply play each other in a proper league of their own? If there are 16 which is being proposed then that is enough for a proper league. Job done. Maybe the winner of the JPT could then play the winner of the B league cup . The charity shield for lower league football. .
 
This is crazy and as often happens people who run clubs sell their soul to gain a few quid extra. I wouldn't be surprised if they interfere with the draw and that the B teams all play away in the early round meaning that the clubs in div 1 and 2 have the chance of a home match v Arsenal B and therefore get a decent gate.
 
I think we should pull out the JPT and enter the world cup instead.
 
This is crazy and as often happens people who run clubs sell their soul to gain a few quid extra. I wouldn't be surprised if they interfere with the draw and that the B teams all play away in the early round meaning that the clubs in div 1 and 2 have the chance of a home match v Arsenal B and therefore get a decent gate.

I have not read the whole thing through but I think its the other way round, if you are drawn at home to a B team in the group stage you get to play at their ground.

There would be sixteen groups of four clubs, with each group having a B Team included. Teams would play each other once on a pre-drawn home/away basis, with any matches involving the B Team that see them drawn as the 'home' team played at the Premier League club's main stadium. The winners of the group would follow through to the final sixteen of the competition. This would guarantee each team at least three matches in the competition.

Just read that through again and I'm not so sure now! I think it just means that B teams have to play at their main home ground. Not sure if its still regional I don't think it will be?


This bit as well - They want all gate receipts from matches played on the Premier League grounds put into a central pool for later distribution to the 48 Football League clubs

I doubt the gate receipts will be huge lets face it they are going to have to have really cheap admission prices in the first place to get decent crowds.
 
Well if they're going to include the b teams in the jpt as an obvious stepping stone to league admission in a few years when we've been softened upvthen that's me never going to a jpt ever again. And I'd be happy to man the picket lines to make sure this decision is a disaster. Football belongs to the people, not the accountants and the greedy bar stewards.
 
If they want their precious England candidates to get some decent footy then why don't they stop the big prem clubs having loads of the feckers on their books .. That way they can try to get into champ n league 1 and 2 teams. If they are good enough
 
BIt of misinformation here - a vote has NOT taken place, but will do so in the summer.

I give up trying to link to the tweet, but follow Against League 3, and it's there.
 
i think this could be a decent calculated risk from the FL to be honest. even most of the big clubs dont carry a hugely competitive U21 team (as many are out on loan etc) and wouldnt do just to participate in JPT, and when they are all picked off in the first round by league 1 and 2 clubs it will show how ridiculous the idea of them playing league football is. the competition does need a revamp every now and then as its shown to be a loss maker unless you get to the area final onwards.
 
Back
Top