wakes123
Manager⭐
What a bizarre way to run a football club if that's the case.Brown says he's spoken to Staam and he isn't interested in Coker. Claims it's the owners that have been bidding on lot's of different players.
What a bizarre way to run a football club if that's the case.Brown says he's spoken to Staam and he isn't interested in Coker. Claims it's the owners that have been bidding on lot's of different players.
and the circus way we run ours is the benchmark....? Don't think we should throw stones!!What a bizarre way to run a football club if that's the case.
and the circus way we run ours is the benchmark....? Don't think we should throw stones!!
He is gone - he will know he will earn bigger bucks there so he will want to go!
It appears to be quite common these days where foreign owners are concerned. Think I would rather have Ron than a loony tune, just look at Blackburn as an example, shockingly run.What a bizarre way to run a football club if that's the case.
It appears to be quite common these days where foreign owners are concerned. Think I would rather have Ron than a loony tune, just look at Blackburn as an example, shockingly run.
This way of doing business with low, not quite so low, still low, offers for a player are unfair practice IMO; and the non selling club ought to get some compensation for it. The player gets unsettled, rumours start, fans get brassed off.
Possibly a better solution (outside a tribunal) is that the bidding club pays 10% of the offer as a non returnable "deposit": so if Reading offered 75k first then we keep 7.5k when the bid is rejected.
Might cause clubs to think some more on low bids?
This is just a quick thought, please be reasonable when rubbishing this idea!
This way of doing business with low, not quite so low, still low, offers for a player are unfair practice IMO; and the non selling club ought to get some compensation for it. The player gets unsettled, rumours start, fans get brassed off.
Possibly a better solution (outside a tribunal) is that the bidding club pays 10% of the offer as a non returnable "deposit": so if Reading offered 75k first then we keep 7.5k when the bid is rejected.
Might cause clubs to think some more on low bids?
This is just a quick thought, please be reasonable when rubbishing this idea!
This latest tweet doesn't fill me full of confidence:
Have a read of the previous tweets.
I read that tweet as cokes chilling the reading supporter out....pointing out they released cox in a huffy manner.