Daniel Bentley - The Ongoing Transfer Saga

[Firestorm]

No idea but it doesn't alter the fact that that is why he does it.

I thought it was established last season that by sponsoring the shirts, as opposed to just putting funds into the club to pay the bills, it got around FFP regulations ?

 

[RHB]

Remind me of the last time that one of his myriad companies made a profit and so incurred tax liabilities that sponsorship could be written off against.

No idea but it doesn't alter the fact that that is why he does it.

I thought it was established last season that by sponsoring the shirts, as opposed to just putting funds into the club to pay the bills, it got around FFP regulations ?

Keep on topic you lot, or the deleters will getcha.:smile:

 

[yogi bear up the cagire]

Wrong thread..........well, it's still early in the morning! :smile::blush:

 

[fbm]

I thought it was established last season that by sponsoring the shirts, as opposed to just putting funds into the club to pay the bills, it got around FFP regulations ?

:off topic:

That may well be the case. When it first happened at the beginning of last season, I was at the club for something or other and SK was talking to a group of us explaining why MD were the sponsors. I don't remember FFP being mentioned but it makes sense. Of course if MD made a profit at all then it's still an allowable expense but as Mick has said they probably haven't for a while.

Back on topic...

Dan's still here!