Mr Browns Ghost
Youth Team
The fact they haven’t left means they will know something …
I can't believe they are still here either as ron gave them a job and loosing 7 games on the trot doesn't exactly put yourself in the shop window.We should have made playoffs and are the biggest club in the league! they failed in there task of promotion! Its dog eat dog and football is harsh.
I'd keep maher,but this season he failed and should have made at least the playoffs.Who would you rather have in charge Steve?
And of course they're under contract, they can't just leaveThey might simple still be here as they have had no better offers yet.
You answered your own question.Why would Kev and Co still stick with us?
They have families and Bills to Pay etc etc
I’m sure they have been told something about the new buyer and going by past pictures they do socialise outside of football with Stan collymore & he’s sure to know what’s going on with in the clubKevin did say he is in contact with Tom on a dayly bases .So its my guess Tom may have told him to ssit tight As new owners are not to far from being at the club .You say your suprised that kevin and his team are still hear .Well i am suprised Tom is still around .That maybe good news as well that he knows something we dont know YET
I truly Hope you are correct and change is about to happen! COYB, UTBI imagine kev in particular is incredibly excited about potentially managing a club he cares for without ron martin in charge.
Him and the other two have done most of the hard work already in terms of changing the ethos of what was a perpetually losing team.
The shackles will be off with a new owner and optimism will abound.
I hope not, they do seem a very tight knit team.the last thing the club wants is to loose our management setup so i guess if things are moving forward the 3 amigos would be kept up to date .
Yes. Maybe we should have sacked the players tooAm I truly the only person on here who thinks that loosing 7 games in a row isn't a sackable offence?
Can we sack you?Am I truly the only person on here who thinks that loosing 7 games in a row isn't a sackable offence?
Yes because you have applied no context to it whatsoever.Am I truly the only person on here who thinks that loosing 7 games in a row isn't a sackable offence?
I think you should be sacked from Shrimperzone for 7 cack posts in a row.Am I truly the only person on here who thinks that loosing 7 games in a row isn't a sackable offence?
Under normal circumstances, perhaps.Am I truly the only person on here who thinks that loosing 7 games in a row isn't a sackable offence?