Quote[/b] (Matt the Shrimp @ Oct. 05 2004,15:56)]
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Napster @ Oct. 05 2004,15:08)]
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Hong Kong Blue @ Oct. 05 2004,14:05)]and if it wasn't for the fact that Nottingham Forest, Barry Fry and Vic Jobson were all clearly white than white and would never be involved with a bung I'd suggest that there may have been a brown envelope or two involved.
OK, you can libel the dead but not the living.
Or rather, it's impossible to libel the dead, but very possible indeed to defame the living.
Of all the SZ members, I'd also have expected young Matthew to have been a little more circumspect, what with the legal background and all that. The use of sarcasm is always a tricky one... and ultimately, I think I'm right in saying that the test for defamation is what it was intended to be understood from the statement as published...
As for the Lee situation, I can't see why you would want to give him abuse. He was here for 7 months, scored 6 goals, and we made £50K profit. Just what exactly is bad about any of that from a Southend United point of view?
So far as I can see, Lee's time at Roots Hall was beneficial to both player and club. Of extremely limited benefit, perhaps; but beneficial nonetheless.
That being so, why boo him? Hasn't he had a bad enough time elsewhere?
Matt