• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

EastStandBlue

Life President
Joined
May 29, 2005
Messages
15,519
I'll admit it. I paid the full £14 to watch 76 seconds of boxing last night. I was fooled by a Jewish New Yorker who talked a good game, but failed to mark his words with any kind of action.

After taking two attempts and a stripping to make the 10 stone weight limit, Dmitriy Salita informed a watching press pack that he intended to "take the guys head off", before mentioning that his faith would see him through. There might just be one more atheist in the world last night, as God certainly wasn't looking out for Salita ten seconds into his light feitherweight title fight with Amir Khan.

The orthodox Jew, previously undefeated, walked into a ferocious left-right combination and was sprawled across the canvas to the shock of the onlooking Newcastle Metro Arena and disgust of the thousands who'd been conned into paying for the pleasure on Sky. The Peruvian referee gave Salita a standing eight count, but it was evident to all and sundry that he was in a completely different world now... Probably hosting a seance with Derek Acorah.

Two further knock downs followed before the fight was called, with Khan recording his first defence in an extraordinary 76 seconds. Taking nothing away from Khan, who executed an explosive plan with perfection, Salita looked amazed to see him come out of the blocks firing. "I'm a slow starter and he started fast, faster than I could ever have imagined," commented a dejected Salita, but what is all the more bewildering is that Khan has always started quickly. Only against the big-hitters of Barrera and Kotelnik has Khan made a cautious start and, even then, he was lively in fits and starts.

Salita himself questioned Khan's credentials and was more than happy to point out how "chinny" Khan has looked in his previous fights. He's right, I've had my doubts about Khan's ability to take a punch ever since a part-time primary teacher put him on his arse on ITV. The main problem being that you have to catch Khan before you can punch him and, under Freddie Roach, nobody has come close to catching him so far.

The astonishing display will definitely see the bright lights calling for Khan. Roach has polished another rough-cut into a gem of a boxer and the Bolton-born Khan, who turns 23 on Tuesday, has more than earned his right to make some serious cash in the casinos of the Las Vegas strip. First, though, Khan will be helping stablemate Pacquiao prepare for his titanic encounter with Floyd Mayweather, cued to take place sometime in March next year.

Roach stated his belief that Khan can capture the world and the weight division and, with performances like that, it's hard to argue with him.
 
Last edited:
I pay my subscription to Sky, therefore having paid once I refuse to pay for any PPV events. I wish everyone would take a similar stance, but won't hold my breath.
 
I know what you mean. I went to the Haye-Maccarinelli fight at the O2 last year, paid £100 for decent seats (four rows from ringside) and watched The Hayemaker destroy Enzo in 2 rounds. Proper ripped off.
 
I know what you mean. I went to the Haye-Maccarinelli fight at the O2 last year, paid £100 for decent seats (four rows from ringside) and watched The Hayemaker destroy Enzo in 2 rounds. Proper ripped off.

There must have been a support card, and not the one fight.
While boxing may have a maximum of 12 rounds it isn't guaranteed, unlike you know you'll get 90 minutes (however good or bad) at a football match.
 
There was a support card to watch last night but I still felt like I had been mugged for £14.63. Salita wasted 6 weeks of his life training for that -Rick Waller would have lasted longer.
 
There was a support card to watch last night but I still felt like I had been mugged for £14.63. Salita wasted 6 weeks of his life training for that -Rick Waller would have lasted longer.

He might have struggled to make the weight though.
 
There must have been a support card, and not the one fight.
While boxing may have a maximum of 12 rounds it isn't guaranteed, unlike you know you'll get 90 minutes (however good or bad) at a football match.

Yes but a very weak undercard, one i'd never have paid money to watch, let alone 100 squid
 
Last edited:
Khan will be a victim of his own success in the long run in terms of PPV viewers. There's very few people who will actually pay out £15 now to watch him unless he's fighting a Hatton/Pac Man etc.

Takes the mick really that they charge £15 to watch Khan but they show Pac Man/Cotto for free which was one the fights of the year.

Fair play to Khan though, he can only beat whats put in front of him and her certainly does that at the moment.
 
Out of interest, how much do you think they could get away with charging for Mayweather v. Pacman? I'm not much of a boxing fan, but even I'd stay up and pay money for that...

Thoughts?
 
Out of interest, how much do you think they could get away with charging for Mayweather v. Pacman? I'm not much of a boxing fan, but even I'd stay up and pay money for that...

Thoughts?

Expect it to be £19.99. Bouts usually cost £14.99 (£14.63 with the tax reduction) but Sky will inevitably pump the prices up slightly for the bout of the decade. At £19.99, it's still feasible for both boxing fans and genuine spectators whilst cashing in on the spectacle.

It's been pencilled in for mid March and, should negotiations go smoothly, which they won't, that's when it'll be. There's a bit of a row emerging between the two camps as Pacquiao apparently wants the purse split 60/40 in his favour because of his global appeal, remember he wanted the Hatton purse split 70/30 in his favour, but the only way this fight will go ahead is if it's 50/50. Either way, both fighters stand to make $100m from the fight.
 
I know what you mean. I went to the Haye-Maccarinelli fight at the O2 last year, paid £100 for decent seats (four rows from ringside) and watched The Hayemaker destroy Enzo in 2 rounds. Proper ripped off.

I paid for the Haye v big bloke fight and found it relatively boring watching a bloke run away for 12 rounds. At least you saw some action.
 
I paid for the Haye v big bloke fight and found it relatively boring watching a bloke run away for 12 rounds. At least you saw some action.

To be fair to Haye he did break his hand in the 2nd round, the last round was good though.
 
Back
Top