• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

I'm sure this will be well received

thanksfortheinfo1_2.jpg
 
I bet the occupants were really pleased about that, or maybe the developers who were refurbishing it or even maintaining it......Oh no there weren't any. Whilst i do not condone the actions of many squatters and I am not keen on the "rights" they end up having after a period of occupancy, given the numbers of homeless , is there any harm being done ? No one is losing any rent or revenue and as long as there is no criminal damage either.

One would have thought that the duke of Westminster would have had someone to lock his windows.....
 
Back
Top