jerseyshrimper
Manager
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2008
- Messages
- 2,166
hearsay then not now
hearsay then not now
http://www.lutontown.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10372~1473455,00.html
Its on Luton Town's official website also...
http://www.lutontown.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10372~1473455,00.html
Its on Luton Town's official website also...
It sounds like we're OK as we got clearance from the FA. I can understand Luton's stance if they were denied the same opportunity, and it appears they are not contesting the result.
news of official complaint on Lutons OS now!
http://www.lutontown.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10372~1473455,00.html
I do have a lot of sympathy with them, having read their case. Yet another FA ****-up!
Whatever the rights and wrongs, how refreshing that it is Southend United that managed to get things correctly through the system to achieve the necessary clearance!
What is going on here?
Luton checked with the FA before the first round if they could play an under 16 in the cup and apparently the answer was no they couldn’t play. This position was then circulated throughout the management of the club. (from the luton post above)
It was clearly public on Saturday that we would have an under 16 year old in our squad, yet Luton dont seem to have made any complaint before the game. Then 2 hours after the game news breaks on here of a protest.
Now, when it has come clear that Southend did nothing wrong, Lutons protest is about nothing more than the FAs vendetta against their club.
hmmmmmmmmmmmm