I didn't attend but listened to the words of Paul Clark who, once again, is spot on with every piece of analysis.
- Their players seems to play within the spaces between our defence and midfield.
- We don't follow the man, we follow the ball.
- Our midfield do not mark goalside of the opposition. Means we are always chasing shadows.
- Blackman so far out of position on the left, no cover from Hutchinson.
- Weak from crosses. Their third goal was greeted with a "What have I said".
- Confusion as to why we play Goodship on the wing when he scores 30+ at CF.
- Our players not following on after a shot, both in attack and defence (Goal #2)
Let's not paper over the cracks, we conceded three at home again however the positives are we've scored 3, we've gained a point and it sounded like there were some signs on improvement.
Grab a result tomorrow night and Saturday and suddenly everything begins to look rosy.
- Their players seems to play within the spaces between our defence and midfield.
- We don't follow the man, we follow the ball.
- Our midfield do not mark goalside of the opposition. Means we are always chasing shadows.
- Blackman so far out of position on the left, no cover from Hutchinson.
- Weak from crosses. Their third goal was greeted with a "What have I said".
- Confusion as to why we play Goodship on the wing when he scores 30+ at CF.
- Our players not following on after a shot, both in attack and defence (Goal #2)
Let's not paper over the cracks, we conceded three at home again however the positives are we've scored 3, we've gained a point and it sounded like there were some signs on improvement.
Grab a result tomorrow night and Saturday and suddenly everything begins to look rosy.