londonblue
Topgun Pilot
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2004
- Messages
- 19,205
Overpaying isn't unethical, just bad business.
In your opinion. In mine it's unethical. The government can do one!
Overpaying isn't unethical, just bad business.
As far as I know the ANC aren't a terrorist organisation anymore. There's no need. Anyway, I said USUALLY.
In your opinion. In mine it's unethical. The government can do one!
Quite agree. . Less tax, less State involvement,
Quite agree. . Less tax, less State involvement,
Actually, the USA only removed the ANC from its terrorist watch list as recently as 2008.
In answer to your previous point, it obviously depends on who is doing the designating.
What part of state involvement would you like to see reduced? Seeing as we're down to the bare minimum as it is.
No, actually it was SAM.
And that incidentally was an indirect reference to a Hamas rally, where JC admitted to putting some loose change in a collection bucket but couldn't remember (understandibly) how much he'd contributed.
Tax avoidance, while legal, is often extremely unethical, as it is in Google's case (and in that of many other large multi-nationals).
Network Rail for one. :raspberry:
You mean like the UK Government and Hamas? What Corbyn was doing giving them even his loose change I'll never know. (Although if he did this before March 2001 then I suppose he wasn't breaking the law even if he was acting unethically.)
List of Terrorist Organisations
You might think of Hamas as a terrorist organisation.Others don't necessarily.
No actually you mentioned buckets and loose change not Shrimpers are Magic
But then Google never went out and brought armalite rifles with that loose change, did they.
Very true but then Blair won three General Elections, Corbyn is still living in the 1970's. Google taking the ****? of course they are and it leaves a bad taste but then so does donating to terrorists.
The government does. He broke the law.
A ethical lesson on tax avoidance from our very own self admitting tax dodger.
Delicious.
While I most certainly spoke about buckets and loose change it, as you can see from his post quoted above, was actually SAM who mentioned the subject of terrorists first.
You,on the other hand,have twice made allegations about JC, which you have not been able to substantiate.
Nothing new there.:smile:
Have I? Oh well, obviously you still can't see what others have posted even after digging back to repost them. I stated no implication nor mentioned terrorists and no- where in Shrimpers are Magic's post does it mention buckets or loose change. So at the risk of playing the poster, pick the nuts out of that one.
But then Google never went out and brought armalite rifles with that loose change, did they.
[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Genial Harry Grout;1829615]You were the one suggesting a bit of loose change was getting chucked in buckets, not me. I wonder how many Kilburn pubs he used to get round, if you know what I mean.
Don't think there are any charges outstandiing against him though.
Since when did you set yourself up as judge and jury?
The same time you did when you said bombing Dresden was a war crime even though you admitted you have no idea what the law was at the time.
As I said, he broke the law.
You have quite clearly implied (but have not had the courage to state openly,which I imagine is what you believe),that Jeremy Corbyn has contributed to IRA funds,which were used to buy arms.
How about posting some evidence for this claim?