Cheeky feck! I've made a lady pregnant! :hilarious:
Ah so you are bi-sexual then.
Cheeky feck! I've made a lady pregnant! :hilarious:
Ah so you are bi-sexual then.
Not mine I hope!
Cheeky feck! I've made a lady pregnant! :hilarious:
Ah so you are bi-sexual then.
That's pretty archaic. Gay is something you're born, not something you're made into. And with views like that, is it no wonder that people are scared to come out, even in 2011.
I'm prepared to accept archaic. We will have to fundamentally disagree on the other point.
As I said to Rusty, if you can explain homosexual activity in wild animals for any other reason then I shall firmly believe that gay is something you're born and not made.
As I said to Rusty, if you can explain homosexual activity in wild animals for any other reason then I shall firmly believe that gay is something you're born and not made.
Do these animals completely shun heterosexual activity? Do you believe in natural selection? Is engaging purely in homosexual activity a good way to perpetuate your species?
As I said to Rusty, if you can explain homosexual activity in wild animals for any other reason then I shall firmly believe that gay is something you're born and not made.
Genuine question: are some species gayer than other species?
ie is a penguin more likely to be gay than a tiger?
No idea mate, I'm no expert. I agree engaging in homosexual activity is not a good way to propergate the species, but it's obviously a tiny %age of animals that do it (if they're predominitely homo rather than bisexual), or there'd be mass extinction.
If there's no species advantage in it, why else would some animals partake (or pargive?). Is it because it's enjoyable? Is it because they're dumb animals and unable to distinguish gender dimorphism? Is it because the opposite sex doesn't put out and homosexuality is a method to partially satisfy a biological urge? Is it a genetic mutation? I'm not sure that homosexual activity in animals can ever be proof that humans can be homosexual from birth...
Genuine question: are some species gayer than other species?
ie is a penguin more likely to be gay than a tiger?
If there's no species advantage in it, why else would some animals partake (or pargive?). Is it because it's enjoyable? Is it because they're dumb animals and unable to distinguish gender dimorphism? Is it because the opposite sex doesn't put out and homosexuality is a method to partially satisfy a biological urge? Is it a genetic mutation? I'm not sure that homosexual activity in animals can ever be proof that humans can be homosexual from birth...
I refer the honourable gentleman to the post above......
Dumb or blind? Have you ever seen animals in the wild wear glasses?
And as for PC - well, it's pretty pointless railing against homosexuality because it's been around since humanity begun
What should we do, criminalise it and hide it underground ?
I think its easier to come out in todays society than 20 years ago
Saying things like 'Oh please.'.