• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

I dont recall any thing at the time that said we would have had a smaller stadium rejected and Im sure 15k or 16k would have been accepted, although Id have been disappointed with that. I thought 18k would have been a good size with plenty of room for peaks, but if building a 22k is no different then makes little difference.

Im sure Ron did work out a figure, but calculations based on Championship football are all well and good when we have been in lower leagues for the majority of our existence.

All that said it still dismisses the claims others make about him being in it solely for the money, he wouldnt be building a stadium for an opimistic future in the Championship if all he wanted was profit.
 
Back
Top