Tangled up in Blue
Certified Senior Citizen⭐
Comparing what Townshend did to you or I viewing adult porn is bonkers.
We've been here before, haven't we? :zzzzz:
Comparing what Townshend did to you or I viewing adult porn is bonkers.
We've been here before, haven't we? :zzzzz:
I totally agree with all of this Firestorm, well said.
As for paedo's, castration at their first offence when found guilty, would help to stop their sick urges and in a lot of cases, prevent another child from being abused or stop another customer from looking at or downloading horrendus child images.
Failing that, this is the only scenario that I would gladly beat someone up or even throw in a little torture to help them see the error of their ways. Can't believe I just said that, but having a little daughter of my own, it's a subject that I can never come to terms with or understand their pleasure, and it really really makes my blood boil.
The thing is, they get their urges because they're mentally ****ed up and enjoy that power of kids. Castration would solve only 50% of it. A labotomy with an egg whisk should take care of the other 50%
Genetically paedophiles have more genes in common with crabs than they do with you or me. Now that is scientific fact.
Berrichonne shrimper;1105727 As for porn said:That's something we have in common then Tony.:)
Why do I get the feeling I've stumbled into an edition of Brass Eye?
I can see Cecil Jones School walking down Eastern Avenue as I write this.
Why do I get the feeling I've stumbled into an edition of Brass Eye?
I can see Cecil Jones School walking down Eastern Avenue as I write this.
Ah, the equivalent of the "I can't be racist, I have black friends" argument.
I can vouch for a benefit gig Pete did for a Cornish theatre company down here back in '98
QUOTE]
So what has that got to do with anything or did you just want to drop in that you've seen Pete Townshend? Can anyone who saw Gary Glitter play Wolverhampton Poly in 1977 now "vouch" for him too?
I think you'll have to refer to the original thread cited to see the context of my quote there. From memory, it was something to do with Pete's charity work with The Lions, and I was just 'vouching' for the fact that it was real, not a front since the 2003 arrest.
What are you on about? Maybe I'm :dim: but I don't see your correlation here ...
I think you'll have to refer to the original thread cited to see the context of my quote there. From memory, it was something to do with Pete's charity work with The Lions, and I was just 'vouching' for the fact that it was real, not a front since the 2003 arrest.
Oh Saint Pete now is it?
But the point being that in order to write Tommy he did not need to do any "Research" (or he certainly didn't get caught doing any) so why the need when it comes to writing a book which has never materialsed.
Also it is well known about the Abused becoming the Abuser cycle and whilst it may be seen as mitigation , its no excuse
Bringing up Townsend's allegations that he was abused himself to counter his alleged offences? It's a cheap ploy that simply does not excuse his actions.
Similar to how the "I can't be racist, I have black friends" argument is completely defunct.
Oh Saint Pete now is it?
More of one than you or I, I'd wager.
I'm broadly in agreement with what my brother Shrimpero wrote (above)about Pete Townsend.
BTW Polanski is not a paedophile.:chill: