• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

PG Site Services on Twitter again

I speculated earlier in the season that I wondered if they could be future new owners, wouldn't surprise me, although they're wealthy people I don't think they likely have deep enough pockets. Based on nothing.
Sort of goes with what BoyWonder2 said that they were in talks with a prospective buyer but dont think he can afford to buy everything.
 
BoyWonder2 you say they agreed to be our sponsor for the next 5 years, was a contract signed , if so and they break that contract, do the club have any recourse they can follow for break of contract . I understand they have put a lot of money into the club ,but that by no means gives them the right to dictate to the club ,they have got what they paid for thats naming rights on the shirts.
I would imagine the club have already broken the terms of the contract in some way (like most other contracts signed by the club). Maybe not the actual Sponsorship contract but certainly any agreement to do with the loan.
 
This company shows that communication isn’t always the right way forward. We already have an owner who is an absolutely clown to put it politely however this company definitely want to give him a run for his money (lol) when it comes to being the most outrageous.

To be honest I understand why they are constantly ****ed off but a little bit of DD before becoming sponsor is all that was needed to see they wouldn’t have it easy. I’d much prefer that we didn’t have them as a sponsor next year as we don’t need the drama with them too.

At this rate there may not be a team too sponsor 🤦‍♂️
 
I would be very surprised if PG site services didnt conduct fairly extensive DD. They have been in business for some time, involved in, significant contracts and know perfectly well how to tie up legal agreements, especially if forking out a ton of money to one Ronald Martin
Those agreement's would have to be abided by, The sums provided to the club were seemingly very significant and we may not have ben on here anymore without them, or had a club, worth bearing that perspective in mind whilst the key board warriors worry about a few wayward tweets or a spelling mistake
 
Not sure I’m following this. Assuming the last publication from the Shrimpers Trust was in relation to season tickets, what does this have to do with future sponsorship?

I can’t see this being a positive announcement but I hope I am proven wrong!
 
I would be very surprised if PG site services didnt conduct fairly extensive DD. They have been in business for some time, involved in, significant contracts and know perfectly well how to tie up legal agreements, especially if forking out a ton of money to one Ronald Martin
Those agreement's would have to be abided by, The sums provided to the club were seemingly very significant and we may not have ben on here anymore without them, or had a club, worth bearing that perspective in mind whilst the key board warriors worry about a few wayward tweets or a spelling mistake
I wonder who their legal adviser is.

Theyve blocked at least one fan I know of as well.
 
I speculated earlier in the season that I wondered if they could be future new owners, wouldn't surprise me, although they're wealthy people I don't think they likely have deep enough pockets. Based on nothing.
If he's doing his nut over 40k, he's hardly going to be happy and willing to lose probably 500k to a Million a year on SUFC.
 
I would be very surprised if PG site services didnt conduct fairly extensive DD. They have been in business for some time, involved in, significant contracts and know perfectly well how to tie up legal agreements, especially if forking out a ton of money to one Ronald Martin
Those agreement's would have to be abided by, The sums provided to the club were seemingly very significant and we may not have ben on here anymore without them, or had a club, worth bearing that perspective in mind whilst the key board warriors worry about a few wayward tweets or a spelling mistake
Companies who do fairly extensive DD are in the minority. Most wing it, cutting corners wherever possible to save money. Proper DD costs money. It’s like buying a house: the most expensive purchase most people will ever make and yet people just go with the cheapest conveyancers - or worse the conveyancer recommended by the estate agent - so they end up with a pro forma report written by an unqualified paralegal or secretary, which they then ignore anyway.
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary Andys man club
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top