The thing with Orient is that Martin Ling doesn't seem to be able to motivate his players.[b said:Quote[/b] (bas blue @ Jan. 26 2005,21:47)]it could all go pear shaped in a very short space of time eg orient !
Yeah, but if you break down it's nice to have a decent selection of spare parts to hand.[b said:Quote[/b] (Southend Shrimp @ Jan. 26 2005,23:24)]If we bring people in now, it might unsettle the squad.
If it aint broke.....don't fix it.
The same old division next season would suit the club, and me, just fine. Assuming we can keep in the play-off zone and if we made the final at Cardiff again I think our (operating) financial position would be extremely healthy.[b said:Quote[/b] (rabbloke @ Jan. 26 2005,22:07)]My pet subject. New faces this season or same old division next season. How does that equate with the financial arguments?.
Cant agree with a word you said. Its not all about money or the spending of huge amounts. Why Premier$hite or championship loanees? Where did we get Gower or Bentley from and not to mention Holloway or are you suggesting any old keeper will do if needed? We have had a good season on and off the field. Better than most would have anticipated so there should be a couple of sheckles to strengthen on approval. Some have mentioned Broughton, Corbett, Kightly and Jupp. Well Broughton was not good enough to figure before, Tilly seems to hate Corbett, Kightly was surplus to requirements and Jupp had lost favour before his injury. So why should we make do with them now? Husbands is only a player by payroll number so we can discount him. Sorry to disagree but we need a couple of fit bodies to join the side now and there are loads out there capable of keeping the wheels on the promotion bandwagon at least until some of our more preferred players are fit. Come on Tilly! Come on RM! The financial reward of promotion far outwieghs the tuppence of getting us there.[b said:Quote[/b] (Ron Manager @ Jan. 27 2005,10:12)]We all want promotion, and we would all love to get promotion by spending whatever is neccesary. But we have to operate within a budget and we have to assume, financially, that we will be in this division again next year. That's not being defeatist but good business sense.
OK, we could throw League One money at the squad on the assumption that we will be in League One next year, but what if we don't? Where will that leave us? I'll tell you where, in the same situation we were in when we got relegated from the First Division, with players on First Division contracts but the club making Second and then Third Division money. That very nearly bankrupted us and we are only now beginning to show signs of recovering.
So I'm sorry, stick with our current prudent policy (which is working pretty well don't forget) and we will build something solid and financially stable. If we get promoted this year it's a bonus and we can re-asses the financial situation then but I wouldn't be happy at gambling the good work that has been done in a throw of the dice stab at promotion at all costs.
You can't agree with a word I said? Really?[b said:Quote[/b] (rabbloke @ Jan. 27 2005,11:48)]Cant agree with a word you said. Its not all about money or the spending of huge amounts. Why Premier$hite or championship loanees? Where did we get Gower or Bentley from and not to mention Holloway or are you suggesting any old keeper will do if needed? We have had a good season on and off the field. Better than most would have anticipated so there should be a couple of sheckles to strengthen on approval. Some have mentioned Broughton, Corbett, Kightly and Jupp. Well Broughton was not good enough to figure before, Tilly seems to hate Corbett, Kightly was surplus to requirements and Jupp had lost favour before his injury. So why should we make do with them now? Husbands is only a player by payroll number so we can discount him. Sorry to disagree but we need a couple of fit bodies to join the side now and there are loads out there capable of keeping the wheels on the promotion bandwagon at least until some of our more preferred players are fit. Come on Tilly! Come on RM! The financial reward of promotion far outwieghs the tuppence of getting us there.[b said:Quote[/b] (Ron Manager @ Jan. 27 2005,10:12)]We all want promotion, and we would all love to get promotion by spending whatever is neccesary. But we have to operate within a budget and we have to assume, financially, that we will be in this division again next year. That's not being defeatist but good business sense.
OK, we could throw League One money at the squad on the assumption that we will be in League One next year, but what if we don't? Where will that leave us? I'll tell you where, in the same situation we were in when we got relegated from the First Division, with players on First Division contracts but the club making Second and then Third Division money. That very nearly bankrupted us and we are only now beginning to show signs of recovering.
So I'm sorry, stick with our current prudent policy (which is working pretty well don't forget) and we will build something solid and financially stable. If we get promoted this year it's a bonus and we can re-asses the financial situation then but I wouldn't be happy at gambling the good work that has been done in a throw of the dice stab at promotion at all costs.
I'm not sure about that. He's either injured or not match fit, so he plays in the reserves and then gets injured again. The same goes for Husbands. There's not really much Tilson can do.[b said:Quote[/b] (rabbloke @ Jan. 27 2005,11:48)]Tilly seems to hate Corbett
Darlington will be a difficult game, but let's face it... Tilson doesn't need to get new faces in!!![b said:Quote[/b] (neil @ Jan. 27 2005,13:49)]Personally I think that Darlington is a massive game. Tilson has shown in the past that he brings someone in when he feels the squad is flat (Eastwood after the 4-0 at Darlington for instance). If we win it will remain the same, but if we lose then he may look to bring someone in.
Don't really understand where your "fit bodies" are supposed to fit in. At the moment one thing we've got going for us is consistency. Who are we going to drop to accomodate a loanee & what are the couple on the sick list going to do when they return?[b said:Quote[/b] (rabbloke @ Jan. 27 2005,11:48)]Cant agree with a word you said. Its not all about money or the spending of huge amounts. Why Premier$hite or championship loanees? Where did we get Gower or Bentley from and not to mention Holloway or are you suggesting any old keeper will do if needed? We have had a good season on and off the field. Better than most would have anticipated so there should be a couple of sheckles to strengthen on approval. Some have mentioned Broughton, Corbett, Kightly and Jupp. Well Broughton was not good enough to figure before, Tilly seems to hate Corbett, Kightly was surplus to requirements and Jupp had lost favour before his injury. So why should we make do with them now? Husbands is only a player by payroll number so we can discount him. Sorry to disagree but we need a couple of fit bodies to join the side now and there are loads out there capable of keeping the wheels on the promotion bandwagon at least until some of our more preferred players are fit. Come on Tilly! Come on RM! The financial reward of promotion far outwieghs the tuppence of getting us there.