The Cleveland one? I'm totally on their side in this case - the kid was armed with a replica gun with no fake "orange" ammo. When being told to raise his hands he went to the gun.
Tragic, but if the kid put his hands in the air as instructed, he'd be alive. The policemen/women have no case to answer in my eyes.
You can tell Southend are winning when mrsblue starts making threads in the Pub section ...
If the kid pointed it at them then the trained marksman ie the police could have shot to injure rather than kill IMO,Sad part is according to witnesses the kid pulled it from his waistband but never aimed at anyone.Look at Michael Brown assassinated in broad daylight.
98% of cops shooting dead people were deemed justifiable which if you look on YouTube many of those caught on camera were mad bad crazy killings by police.
If the kid pointed it at them then the trained marksman ie the police could have shot to injure rather than kill IMO,Sad part is according to witnesses the kid pulled it from his waistband but never aimed at anyone.Look at Michael Brown assassinated in broad daylight.
98% of cops shooting dead people were deemed justifiable which if you look on YouTube many of those caught on camera were mad bad crazy killings by police.
You can tell Southend are winning when mrsblue starts making threads in the Pub section ...
His father said "why didn't they tazer him" My question would be why did you let him go to school with a replica firearm?
If you were in the same position, and you thought there was a slight chance that the gun men could start randomly shooting at fellow school kids, would you wait to see how many he shot before you did anything? Suppose he did shoot 4 or 5 others, and there have been a number of school mass killings in recent years, I'm guessing you would feel pretty sick that you didn't react.
His father said "why didn't they tazer him" My question would be why did you let him go to school with a replica firearm?
Yes of course they have tough decisions and I would hate to be in their situation ,Yet why not aim at his legs.
I have seen disturbing footage of cops shooting to kill where one incident 6 cops fired 43 rounds at a mentally ill man who was holding a piece of wood on wasteland.They are mad IMO.
Yes of course they have tough decisions and I would hate to be in their situation ,Yet why not aim at his legs.
I have seen disturbing footage of cops shooting to kill where one incident 6 cops fired 43 rounds at a mentally ill man who was holding a piece of wood on wasteland.They are mad IMO.
OMG Chapperz I thought you were better than that.
5300?
This article mentions 400, where did you get that stat?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ow-many-police-shootings-a-year-no-one-knows/
Later in that articled they mention:
In 2011, he scoured the Internet several times a day every day, compiling a database of every officer-involved shooting he could find. Ultimately, he tracked 1,146 shootings by police officers, 607 of them fatal shootings.
http://jimfishertruecrime.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/police-involved-shootings-2011-annual.html
If you are faced with a person with a gun you dont start trying to shoot him in the leg, or shoot the gun out of his hand.
Sorry my bad,
Since 9/11 my stats are correct,They were comparing people killed by gangsters and American soldiers killed in Iraq.
So from 9/11 through to 2011 over 5000 were shot and killed by law enforcement.
Yes of course they have tough decisions and I would hate to be in their situation ,Yet why not aim at his legs.
I have seen disturbing footage of cops shooting to kill where one incident 6 cops fired 43 rounds at a mentally ill man who was holding a piece of wood on wasteland.They are mad IMO.[/QUOTE]
You may well have done but that is a totally seperate incident to the one the original post was about.