I tend to agree with this but hope that Tilson doesn't leave the Goat on for too long once he's knackered.[b said:Quote[/b] (steveo @ Mar. 02 2006,10:38)]I would start Goater just for his big game experience. Bradbury can come on when Goater tires which will give the defence something else to think about.
But he never subs players after 10 mins.[b said:Quote[/b] (hexagon_sun @ Mar. 02 2006,11:04)]I tend to agree with this but hope that Tilson doesn't leave the Goat on for too long once he's knackered.[b said:Quote[/b] (steveo @ Mar. 02 2006,10:38)]I would start Goater just for his big game experience. Bradbury can come on when Goater tires which will give the defence something else to think about.
'Prior' to last week at least![b said:Quote[/b] (Ljubljana Branch @ Mar. 02 2006,12:06)]But he never subs players after 10 mins.[b said:Quote[/b] (hexagon_sun @ Mar. 02 2006,11:04)]I tend to agree with this but hope that Tilson doesn't leave the Goat on for too long once he's knackered.[b said:Quote[/b] (steveo @ Mar. 02 2006,10:38)]I would start Goater just for his big game experience. Bradbury can come on when Goater tires which will give the defence something else to think about.![]()
Playing devil's advocate here, please justifify this statement. especially give all the evidence seems to suggest otherwise. (As per the original post.)[b said:Quote[/b] (Ljubljana Branch @ Mar. 02 2006,10:31)]Not for me. I think in such a ding-dong fast game I'd prefer Freddy & Bradbury to start.
Goater offers an option, but I fear the pace of the match might mean that the game largely bypasses him.![]()
Hasn't he justified his selection with his statements?[b said:Quote[/b] (londonblue @ Mar. 02 2006,12:11)]Playing devil's advocate here, please justifify this statement. especially give all the evidence seems to suggest otherwise. (As per the original post.)[b said:Quote[/b] (Ljubljana Branch @ Mar. 02 2006,10:31)]Not for me. I think in such a ding-dong fast game I'd prefer Freddy & Bradbury to start.
Goater offers an option, but I fear the pace of the match might mean that the game largely bypasses him.![]()
Not really, he is saying the pace of a Derby game will pass Goater by, but he scored two in the match earlier this season, and (apparently) has a good record in other derby matches he has played in, that will all have been more cut and thrust than your average match.....[b said:Quote[/b] (moneypit23 @ Mar. 02 2006,12:14)]Hasn't he justified his selection with his statements?[b said:Quote[/b] (londonblue @ Mar. 02 2006,12:11)]Playing devil's advocate here, please justifify this statement. especially give all the evidence seems to suggest otherwise. (As per the original post.)[b said:Quote[/b] (Ljubljana Branch @ Mar. 02 2006,10:31)]Not for me. I think in such a ding-dong fast game I'd prefer Freddy & Bradbury to start.
Goater offers an option, but I fear the pace of the match might mean that the game largely bypasses him.![]()
![]()
Ok,[b said:Quote[/b] (londonblue @ Mar. 02 2006,12:11)]Playing devil's advocate here, please justifify this statement. especially give all the evidence seems to suggest otherwise. (As per the original post.)[b said:Quote[/b] (Ljubljana Branch @ Mar. 02 2006,10:31)]Not for me. I think in such a ding-dong fast game I'd prefer Freddy & Bradbury to start.
Goater offers an option, but I fear the pace of the match might mean that the game largely bypasses him.![]()
I too would start with Goat & Fred, Bradbury looks to hold the ball up well tho & can be a provider for Eastwood.[b said:Quote[/b] (SUFCFARAWAY @ Mar. 02 2006,13:06)]I agree with both sides of the arguement here but for me it is too bigger game to try a new partnership of Freddy and Bradbury. It will have to be Goat along side Sir Fred. I personally with Gray was fit enough to start but he isn't so we have to make do with what we ahve. And what we have is good enough to beat Col******r