I know its all hypothetical as its not going to happen but you really think Southend would stump up anything like that a month? Maybe 10% but that's an absolute maximum.
I for once agree with Barna too and I stated at the time it was the wrong decision. I know it was mentioned an unhappy player won't put in the effort etc but I do feel keeping Barnard would have saved us from relegation. Reminded me very much of the season we let Tilly go when he was playing for us and we got relegated that season too. Releasing key players was the catalyst for our decline on both occasions.
On the other hand, maybe the Barnard money kept us afloat and without the sale we would be no more anyway.
I agree with you all about his going - but I would not have him back - how many returnees have ever worked out for us ?
To be honest (and I am only going on heresay) I'm not sure he's the sort of character we really want anyway. Got himself in trouble at Southampton, plus by all accounts you wouldn't want him as a landlord..
Never works having one big time charlie on high wages in a team of low paid honest triers..
Spencer Prior. Andy Edwards. Dave Webb.
Freddy Eastwood is going to score 38 goals this season so might as well add him to the list now.
To be honest (and I am only going on heresay) I'm not sure he's the sort of character we really want anyway. Got himself in trouble at Southampton, plus by all accounts you wouldn't want him as a landlord..
Never works having one big time charlie on high wages in a team of low paid honest triers..
To be honest (and I am only going on heresay) I'm not sure he's the sort of character we really want anyway. Got himself in trouble at Southampton, plus by all accounts you wouldn't want him as a landlord..
Never works having one big time charlie on high wages in a team of low paid honest triers..
What did he do wrong as a landlord? Try to evict his tentants? As for is character Timlin has just come out of jail and were happy to keep him?
He offered them £100 to leave immediately rather than give them their full notice.
Bit daft but hardly interesting.
Interested to hear some say we sold him to deal with our financial issues. Didn't we take on Patterson in return, then spent ages trying to shake him off the wage bill - must have been on a fair bit!?
I doubt he would want a return after our vile chairman spouted nonsense about him 'downing tools' a few years ago.