Yes, but it only takes a couple of sec's to do/get a signature. People wont care what the case is if you ask them nicely. The more signatures, the better the case their is. Its simple. Even i can work it out ...[b said:
I really don't mean to put a dampener on your efforts believe me, but I think you could be in for a rude shock there. People don't just sign any old petition if you ask them nicely.[b said:
What's the point in doing THAT?! So, the petition gets 1,000 signatures, the club reacts, and then only 50 people turn up in the bloody stand?! Get real, Kev ...[b said:
... and apparently come to the wrong conclusion, Kev. We learnt last time round that it really ISN'T that simple. People will not just sign on a whim. They want to know WHY they are signing and WHAT the consequences are ...[b said:
Well if the people who run this campaign want it to happen then they need all the signatures they can get ...[b said:Quote[/b] (Javea Shrimper @ Mar. 06 2005,11:55)]What's the point in doing THAT?! So, the petition gets 1,000 signatures, the club reacts, and then only 50 people turn up in the bloody stand?! Get real, Kev ...[b said:
WS
It wont be my effort. I wont be actively involved. I would like a return to the North Bank to happen, but only if the crowd's are going to be big enough for it to be warranted. Last time there were things to cut out/rip off/print etc... but people just can't be bothered to do that. Get a clipboard in front of me and ask me to sign it and it only takes 10 seconds and it doesn't conjure up any un-warranted effort for a lazy sod like me ...[b said:
Very true we do but I also understand that if there is not enough people then the situation is not viable! so the situation calls for a fair display of views
Really not sure about this stat.[b said:
OK. 815 registered members. Still not prolific. And if you look through the petition, there are plenty who are probably not even registered with SZ ... and there are instances when people have actually signed twice. Ron Martin already made it clear that he would be looking at around 800 POSITIVE signatories who would MOVE to the North Bank if it was handed back to home fans. There are currently 138 signatures. And some of those advocate the move but wouldn't move themselves : "Anything that gets the Chav scum out of the West and into the North gets my vote!"[b said:
I refer the honourable gentlemen to the answer I gave before : what's the point?![b said:Quote[/b] (The General @ Mar. 06 2005,12:12)]Well if the people who run this campaign want it to happen then they need all the signatures they can get ...[b said:Quote[/b] (Jávea Shrimper @ Mar. 06 2005,11:55)]What's the point in doing THAT?! So, the petition gets 1,000 signatures, the club reacts, and then only 50 people turn up in the bloody stand?! Get real, Kev ...[b said:
WS
If you had the best interests of the club at heart, you wouldn't be thinking like that.[b said:
Even thought I wish for a return I certanly don't wish the club to lose money in anyway if it can be helped![b said:
Agreed. I think these posts have already done irrepairable damage to the "campaign" before it's even got started, OS. I very much doubt the club would take on board such a petition - especially one signed by less than 800 fans AND by a percentage who couldn't care less about the North Bank - and I feel for those who had a genuine interest in making a move back. Some people need to take a real good think before posting - and probably apologise to those trying so hard ...[b said:Quote[/b] (overseas shrimper @ Mar. 07 2005,08:12)]More posts like this, and the club will more than likely not trust any kind of petition handed in.
So, get hold of the campaign by the balls, assign OFFICIAL spokesmen, and either stop others posting stupid remarks like those above or distance yourselves from them ...[b said:
is that not a job for the admin of the site?[b said:
I hope that'll never be the case. Far too much like censorship for my liking.[b said:
Why on earth would it be the job of the admin of the site?
