Napster
No ⭐
Exactly what I'm thinking. For me if a 1.6 million bid did come in and it included a good sell on clause then it would be hard to say no BUT would Brown get any of that?
He's not Barry Fry you know.
:winking:
Exactly what I'm thinking. For me if a 1.6 million bid did come in and it included a good sell on clause then it would be hard to say no BUT would Brown get any of that?
Maybe I'm naive, but I can't believe Bentley would let a situation happen where he goes on a free next summer. I think he has too much respect for the club for that to happen.
Much like with Corr and Timlin, the time to sit down and discuss a new contract with Bentley was November - January. He'd asserted himself as our number one but while clearly destined for bigger and better things, wasn't being spoke about as an excellent prospect by anybody else but Phil Brown. A well-structured, long-term deal which recognised his ability and potential, with clauses to reflect the potential for promotion and/or transfer approach, could've been in the best interests for all involved.
Our failure to do so points to one of two situations. Either we're grossly incompetent when it comes to contract renewals, something which the Corr and Timlin scenarios would certainly attest to, or the club had/has every expectation that he won't be a Southend United player in September, and we wanted to save ourselves a couple of quid by not giving him eight/nine months of increased pay.
The big question is/would be, where will the money go?
Why would it be different to any other player being out of contract who can go on a free e.g Barry Corr?He can't go on a free next summer unless he moves abroad. We'd get some sort of fee.
Why would it be different to any other player being out of contract who can go on a free e.g Barry Corr?
Fair enough - is that something in the FA rules then? Is there a minimum clubs have to pay for players under 24 out of contract?He's under 24.
Fair enough - is that something in the FA rules then? Is there a minimum clubs have to pay for players under 24 out of contract?
Fair enough - is that something in the FA rules then? Is there a minimum clubs have to pay for players under 24 out of contract?
I get the Hull area BBC TV local news where I live. On the lunchtime bulletin today, it was reported that Steve Bruce is hopeful of signing 5 new players for Hull City by the weekend. No names, unfortunately, but it sounds like his chairman has given him the green light to spend the £8 million they have just got from West Brom for James Chester, so he has cash in hand to bid for Bentley if he chooses to do so.
QPR just got £10m from Liverpool from the Raheem Sterling sale so they should have a big chunk of cash. If we can get £1.5m - at least half up front, and 20% sell-on then I think that's a great deal for all three parties.
And, potentially, £15m for Charlie Austin.......................loadsa money to spend :winking:
From the press article, QPR will only bid if Rob Green goes. I haven't seen anything yet which suggests that will happen.